Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are Australia’s Low Fuel Reserves Cause for Concern? (Bloomberg News)

Press/Media: Other

Description

https://archive.md/Wo3C4#selection-1183.0-2132.0

Sole named expert source in the piece. Introduced as "a fuel security expert and senior lecturer at Macquarie University" 

Quoted as the article's expert authority on whether Australia risked running out of refined fuel, identifying April and into May as the real test should the conflict continue. Drawing on shipping data, established that deliveries were largely secured to the middle of April while characterising visibility beyond that point as uncertain — an assessment set against the Energy Minister's report that six of roughly 81 expected vessels had cancelled.

Subject

Australian refined fuel import dependence, Minimum Stockholding Obligation settings and emergency reserve adequacy.

Period29 Mar 2026

Media contributions

1

Media contributions

  • TitleAre Australia's Low Fuel Reserves Cause for Concern? (Bloomberg)
    Degree of recognitionInternational
    Media name/outletbloomberg.com
    Media typeWeb
    Country/TerritoryWorldwide
    Date29/03/26
    Descriptionhttps://archive.md/Wo3C4#selection-1183.0-2132.0

    This Bloomberg explainer examines Australia's exposure to refined fuel disruption following the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. It documents the structural decline from meeting roughly 98 per cent of petroleum product needs in 2000 with eight refineries to importing more than 80 per cent by 2025 with two refineries supplying around 17 per cent, leaving Australia with what the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis describes as the world's largest trade deficit in refined petroleum products. Dr Lurion De Mello, introduced as a fuel security expert, provides the article's forward assessment: that the real test would come in April and into May if the conflict persisted, with shipping data showing deliveries largely secured to mid-April and visibility beyond that point uncertain. The piece explains the Minimum Stockholding Obligation as a privately held requirement rather than a government-controlled reserve on the US model, reports Australian cover at 38 days of petrol and 30 each of diesel and jet fuel on the government's measure and around 49 days on the IEA's, and sets out the ministerial argument that meeting the 90-day obligation would cost approximately A$20 billion over four years. It documents the policy response, including a 20 per cent reduction in stockholding obligations, relaxed sulphur limits, a lowered diesel flashpoint specification, and signals that LNG export leverage might be used to secure supply.
    Producer/AuthorBen Westcott with assistance credited to Keira Wright, Paul-Alain Hunt and Rob Verdonck.
    URLhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-13/what-to-know-about-australia-s-fuel-reserves-as-us-announces-hormuz-blockade
    PersonsLurion De Mello