Description of impact *
Research informed disruption of the long-standing myth that 'good editing is invisible' and articulation of 5 criteria by which good editing in any form or genre of film can be judged lead directly to the creation of the Australian Screen Editors Awards. Established in 2006 these awards continue to use these five criteria as guidelines for judges across an ever expanding range of categories including documentaries, feature films, television, ads, and open content.| Category of impact | Culture impacts, Training impacts |
|---|---|
| Impact level | Benefit (mid) |
Documents & Links
- 'Good Editing is not Invisible' judging criteria from Cutting_Rhythms_Intuitive_Film_Editing_
File: application/pdf, 293 KB
Type: Funding Rules / Guidelines
Related content
-
Projects
-
Activities
-
Australian Screen Editors Guild ASE 'Legends of 2010' Symposium
Activity: Talk or presentation › Presentation
-
Good Editing is Not Invisible
Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
Prizes
-
Impacts
-
Crediting, royalties and representation for Screen Editors with writing credits
Impact: Commercial impacts, Culture impacts
-
Research Outputs
-
Cutting rhythms: intuitive film editing
Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review