Abstract
This paper argues that the early relationship Australia and the United States had with Great Britain shaped acquisition law along different lines. However, despite these founding differences, in practice both countries have tended to resolve acquisition disputes in essentially the same ways.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-45 |
| Number of pages | 45 |
| Journal | Canberra law review |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Case of non-identical twins: comparing the evolution of acquisition law in Australia and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver