TY - JOUR
T1 - A cluster randomized controlled platform trial comparing group MEmory specificity training (MEST) to group psychoeducation and supportive counselling (PSC) in the treatment of recurrent depression
AU - Werner-Seidler, Aliza
AU - Hitchcock, Caitlin
AU - Bevan, Anna
AU - McKinnon, Anna
AU - Gillard, Julia
AU - Dahm, Theresa
AU - Chadwick, Isobel
AU - Panesar, Inderpal
AU - Breakwell, Lauren
AU - Muelle, Viola
AU - Rodrigues, Evangeline
AU - Rees, Catrin
AU - Gormley, Siobhan
AU - Schweizer, Susanne
AU - Watson, Peter
AU - Raes, Filip
AU - Jobson, Laura
AU - Dalgleish, Tim
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Impaired ability to recall specific autobiographical memories is characteristic of depression, which when reversed, may have therapeutic benefits. This cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial investigated efficacy and aspects of acceptability, and feasibility of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) relative to Psychoeducation and Supportive Counselling (PSC) for Major Depressive Disorder (N = 62). A key aim of this study was to determine a range of effect size estimates to inform a later phase trial. Assessments were completed at baseline, posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. The cognitive process outcome was memory specificity. The primary clinical outcome was symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-II at 3-month follow-up. The MEST group demonstrated greater improvement in memory specificity relative to PSC at post-intervention (d = 0.88) and follow-up (d = 0.74), relative to PSC. Both groups experienced a reduction in depressive symptoms at 3-month follow-up (d = 0.67). However, there was no support for a greater improvement in depressive symptoms at 3 months following MEST relative to PSC (d = - 0.04). Although MEST generated changes on memory specificity and improved depressive symptoms, results provide no indication that MEST is superior to PSC in the resolution of self-reported depressive symptoms. Implications for later-phase definitive trials of MEST are discussed.
AB - Impaired ability to recall specific autobiographical memories is characteristic of depression, which when reversed, may have therapeutic benefits. This cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial investigated efficacy and aspects of acceptability, and feasibility of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) relative to Psychoeducation and Supportive Counselling (PSC) for Major Depressive Disorder (N = 62). A key aim of this study was to determine a range of effect size estimates to inform a later phase trial. Assessments were completed at baseline, posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. The cognitive process outcome was memory specificity. The primary clinical outcome was symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-II at 3-month follow-up. The MEST group demonstrated greater improvement in memory specificity relative to PSC at post-intervention (d = 0.88) and follow-up (d = 0.74), relative to PSC. Both groups experienced a reduction in depressive symptoms at 3-month follow-up (d = 0.67). However, there was no support for a greater improvement in depressive symptoms at 3 months following MEST relative to PSC (d = - 0.04). Although MEST generated changes on memory specificity and improved depressive symptoms, results provide no indication that MEST is superior to PSC in the resolution of self-reported depressive symptoms. Implications for later-phase definitive trials of MEST are discussed.
KW - depression
KW - memory specificity training
KW - autobiographical memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044448992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2018.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2018.03.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29587159
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 105
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
ER -