A comparative study of the utilisation of an electronic test–result management system in emergency and intensive care settings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify differences in the utilisation of an electronic medical record test–result management system between two acute care departments. Field observations (130 min) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted in the Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department of an Australian hospital. Work processes identified from audio transcripts were modelled using business process modelling. Comparison of the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit identified the following: (1) test ordering variations according to clinical roles, (2) differences in the use of electronic medical record functionality according to specific demands of the clinical environment and (3) the non-linear components of the test–result management process. Variations were identified in the number of process decisions, external collaborations and temporal process workflows. Modelling the business processes, collaboration and communication needs of individual clinical environments can aid in enhancing the quality and appositeness of health information technology interventions and thus contribute to improving patient safety. Future health information technology interventions/evaluations aimed at improving the safety of test–result management processes need to address both the nuances of the clinical environment and accommodate the individual work practices of clinicians within that environment.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalHealth Informatics Journal
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Critical Care
Medical Informatics
Electronic Health Records
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Emergency Service
Workflow
Patient Safety
Interviews
Safety

Keywords

  • Business Process Model and Notation
  • business process
  • Emergency Department
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • test–result management

Cite this

@article{8f9de458c8d441348bc0b2936193083b,
title = "A comparative study of the utilisation of an electronic test–result management system in emergency and intensive care settings",
abstract = "The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify differences in the utilisation of an electronic medical record test–result management system between two acute care departments. Field observations (130 min) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted in the Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department of an Australian hospital. Work processes identified from audio transcripts were modelled using business process modelling. Comparison of the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit identified the following: (1) test ordering variations according to clinical roles, (2) differences in the use of electronic medical record functionality according to specific demands of the clinical environment and (3) the non-linear components of the test–result management process. Variations were identified in the number of process decisions, external collaborations and temporal process workflows. Modelling the business processes, collaboration and communication needs of individual clinical environments can aid in enhancing the quality and appositeness of health information technology interventions and thus contribute to improving patient safety. Future health information technology interventions/evaluations aimed at improving the safety of test–result management processes need to address both the nuances of the clinical environment and accommodate the individual work practices of clinicians within that environment.",
keywords = "Business Process Model and Notation, business process, Emergency Department, Intensive Care Unit, test–result management",
author = "Judith Thomas and Dahm, {Maria R.} and Julie Li and Westbrook, {Johanna I.} and Andrew Georgiou",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1460458219889223",
language = "English",
journal = "Health Informatics Journal",
issn = "1460-4582",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of the utilisation of an electronic test–result management system in emergency and intensive care settings

AU - Thomas, Judith

AU - Dahm, Maria R.

AU - Li, Julie

AU - Westbrook, Johanna I.

AU - Georgiou, Andrew

PY - 2019/12/3

Y1 - 2019/12/3

N2 - The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify differences in the utilisation of an electronic medical record test–result management system between two acute care departments. Field observations (130 min) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted in the Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department of an Australian hospital. Work processes identified from audio transcripts were modelled using business process modelling. Comparison of the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit identified the following: (1) test ordering variations according to clinical roles, (2) differences in the use of electronic medical record functionality according to specific demands of the clinical environment and (3) the non-linear components of the test–result management process. Variations were identified in the number of process decisions, external collaborations and temporal process workflows. Modelling the business processes, collaboration and communication needs of individual clinical environments can aid in enhancing the quality and appositeness of health information technology interventions and thus contribute to improving patient safety. Future health information technology interventions/evaluations aimed at improving the safety of test–result management processes need to address both the nuances of the clinical environment and accommodate the individual work practices of clinicians within that environment.

AB - The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify differences in the utilisation of an electronic medical record test–result management system between two acute care departments. Field observations (130 min) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted in the Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department of an Australian hospital. Work processes identified from audio transcripts were modelled using business process modelling. Comparison of the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit identified the following: (1) test ordering variations according to clinical roles, (2) differences in the use of electronic medical record functionality according to specific demands of the clinical environment and (3) the non-linear components of the test–result management process. Variations were identified in the number of process decisions, external collaborations and temporal process workflows. Modelling the business processes, collaboration and communication needs of individual clinical environments can aid in enhancing the quality and appositeness of health information technology interventions and thus contribute to improving patient safety. Future health information technology interventions/evaluations aimed at improving the safety of test–result management processes need to address both the nuances of the clinical environment and accommodate the individual work practices of clinicians within that environment.

KW - Business Process Model and Notation

KW - business process

KW - Emergency Department

KW - Intensive Care Unit

KW - test–result management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076889188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1460458219889223

DO - 10.1177/1460458219889223

M3 - Article

JO - Health Informatics Journal

T2 - Health Informatics Journal

JF - Health Informatics Journal

SN - 1460-4582

ER -