Abstract
Researchers have little to guide them when choosing an optimal model for use in auto regressive conditional heteroscedasticity modelling applications. Although the standard class of asymptotic model selection criteria may apply, some researchers have suggested that loss functions need to be developed, which are specific to each particular application. In this article, the relative merits of these two different techniques are considered. The results suggest that the model selection criteria provide superior results, although none of the techniques work well when the data are characterized by power and leverage effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-67 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- ARCH
- Model selection criteria
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of alternative techniques for selecting an optimum ARCH model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver