A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory

Amanda J. Barnier*, John Sutton, Celia B. Harris, Robert A. Wilson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    133 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper, we aim to show that the framework of embedded, distributed, or extended cognition offers new perspectives on social cognition by applying it to one specific domain: the psychology of memory. In making our case, first we specify some key social dimensions of cognitive distribution and some basic distinctions between memory cases, and then describe stronger and weaker versions of distributed remembering in the general distributed cognition framework. Next, we examine studies of social influences on memory in cognitive psychology, and identify the valuable concepts and methods to be extended and embedded in our framework; we focus in particular on three related paradigms: transactive memory, collaborative recall, and social contagion. Finally, we sketch our own early studies of individual and group memory developed within our framework of distributed cognition, on social contagion of autobiographical memories, collaborative flashbulb memories, and memories of high school at a high school reunion. We see two reciprocal benefits of this conceptual and empirical framework to social memory phenomena: that ideas about distributed cognition can be honed against and tested with the help of sophisticated methods in the social-cognitive psychology of memory; and conversely, that a range of social memory phenomena that are as yet poorly understood can be approached afresh with theoretically motivated extensions of existing empirical paradigms.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)33-51
    Number of pages19
    JournalCognitive Systems Research
    Volume9
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this