Abstract
This article explains why a First Nations constitutional voice is intended to be non-justiciable and how this can be achieved through careful constitutional drafting
Original language | English |
---|---|
Specialist publication | The Conversation |
Publication status | Published - 27 Oct 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Constitution
- Constitutional law
- Uluru statement
- Voice to parliament
- Uluru Statement from the Heart