A constitutional Voice to Parliament: ensuring parliament is in charge, not the courts

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/WebsiteArticle

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explains why a First Nations constitutional voice is intended to be non-justiciable and how this can be achieved through careful constitutional drafting
Original languageEnglish
Specialist publicationThe Conversation
Publication statusPublished - 27 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Constitution
  • Constitutional law
  • Uluru statement
  • Voice to parliament
  • Uluru Statement from the Heart

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A constitutional Voice to Parliament: ensuring parliament is in charge, not the courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this