A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety

Joanne Steel, Andrew Georgiou, Susan Balandin, Sophie Hill, Linda Worrall, Bronwyn Hemsley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.

LanguageEnglish
Pages943-956
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume33
Issue number5
Early online date2 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Communication Disorders
Patient Safety
Documentation
Communication
Health
Rehabilitation
Safety

Keywords

  • communication disability
  • documentation
  • health
  • hospitals
  • medical records
  • Patient safety

Cite this

Steel, Joanne ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Balandin, Susan ; Hill, Sophie ; Worrall, Linda ; Hemsley, Bronwyn. / A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes : diagnosis, function, and patient safety. In: Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 943-956.
@article{2855c32d13e243cb9f43c2dc4bf1d0a2,
title = "A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: diagnosis, function, and patient safety",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.",
keywords = "communication disability, documentation, health, hospitals, medical records, Patient safety",
author = "Joanne Steel and Andrew Georgiou and Susan Balandin and Sophie Hill and Linda Worrall and Bronwyn Hemsley",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215518819717",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "943--956",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes : diagnosis, function, and patient safety. / Steel, Joanne; Georgiou, Andrew; Balandin, Susan; Hill, Sophie; Worrall, Linda; Hemsley, Bronwyn.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 943-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes

T2 - Clinical Rehabilitation

AU - Steel,Joanne

AU - Georgiou,Andrew

AU - Balandin,Susan

AU - Hill,Sophie

AU - Worrall,Linda

AU - Hemsley,Bronwyn

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.

AB - Objective: To examine the content, quantity, and quality of multidisciplinary team documentation of ‘communication’ in hospital progress notes of patients with communication disability, and to explore the relationship of this documentation to patient safety. Design: Retrospective chart review involving a descriptive analysis and a qualitative content analysis of the progress notes. Setting: Acute medical and rehabilitation wards in two regional hospitals in one health district in Australia. Participants: Eight patients with communication disability who had experienced documented patient safety incidents in hospital. Methods: In total, 906 progress note entries about communication during 38 hospital admissions were extracted from eight patient’s charts; written by staff in 11 different health disciplines. Data were analysed descriptively according to quantity, and qualitatively according to the content. Results: Four content categories of meaning in progress note entries relating to communication were (1) use of communication diagnostic and impairment terms; (2) notes on the patient’s communicative function; (3) reports of the topic or content of the patient’s communication attempts; and (4) references to third parties communicating for the patient. Communication-related information was often brief, unclear, and/or inaccurate. Descriptions of communicative function and recommended strategies for successful communication were often lacking. Conclusion: The suboptimal documentation of patient communication in progress notes may contribute to the higher risk of patient safety incidents for hospital patients with communication disability. Increased accuracy in documenting communication disability and function in progress notes might assist staff in communicating with these patients and improve the quality and safety of their care.

KW - communication disability

KW - documentation

KW - health

KW - hospitals

KW - medical records

KW - Patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059665660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215518819717

DO - 10.1177/0269215518819717

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 943

EP - 956

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 5

ER -