Abstract
The task of defining technology has had an unhappy history. It seems that agreement about what technology is - and even if a definition should be sought at all - has not been reached. This article argues that a definition is possible and should be sought. The etymology of the word technology suggests that it has long had a socio-technical meaning and, furthermore, Foucault's definition of four types of technologies suggests a framework in which a socio-technical definition of technology can be usefully detailed. In this case the definition helps to provide a broad and deeply contextual understanding of what technology is (in its tangible and intangible forms), the processes which it influences and the processes which influence it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 399-407 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Prometheus (United Kingdom) |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Keywords
- Assemblage of technologies
- Socio-technical systems
- Technologies of power
- Technologies of production
- Technologies of sign systems
- Technologies of the self
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A contextualising, socio-technical definition of technology: Learning from ancient Greece and Foucault'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver