A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Numerous models have been developed to help teachers efficiently and effectively design learning opportunities using new and emerging technologies. However, the literature to date makes little reference to the variation that exists within the models and frameworks as far as their scope, context, epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings and so on. In this paper, we critically contrast models of technology‐enhanced learning design in order to support educator selection of models, as well as to derive an overarching understanding of how learning design models may differ ontologically. A total of 21 models were selected from a systematic search of the technology‐enhanced learning design research literature. Findings indicated that technology‐enhanced learning design models can be differentiated according to whether they constitute a conceptual framework or a procedural method, their epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings, the level of granularity of the model, the extent to which contextual elements are considered, whether interactions between teachers and students are integral, whether guidance for selecting technologies is included and whether any sort of evaluation of the model has been conducted. The utility of each of these dimensions in terms of supporting technology‐enhanced learning design is considered, and the value more broadly of learning design models is critically discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages981-997
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Technology
Volume49
Issue number6
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

learning
teacher
research planning
educator
interaction
evaluation
Values
student
literature

Cite this

@article{80d48d4475a947c6b1bd133289f13125,
title = "A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks",
abstract = "Numerous models have been developed to help teachers efficiently and effectively design learning opportunities using new and emerging technologies. However, the literature to date makes little reference to the variation that exists within the models and frameworks as far as their scope, context, epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings and so on. In this paper, we critically contrast models of technology‐enhanced learning design in order to support educator selection of models, as well as to derive an overarching understanding of how learning design models may differ ontologically. A total of 21 models were selected from a systematic search of the technology‐enhanced learning design research literature. Findings indicated that technology‐enhanced learning design models can be differentiated according to whether they constitute a conceptual framework or a procedural method, their epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings, the level of granularity of the model, the extent to which contextual elements are considered, whether interactions between teachers and students are integral, whether guidance for selecting technologies is included and whether any sort of evaluation of the model has been conducted. The utility of each of these dimensions in terms of supporting technology‐enhanced learning design is considered, and the value more broadly of learning design models is critically discussed.",
author = "Matthew Bower and Panagiotis Vlachopoulos",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/bjet.12668",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "981--997",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Technology",
issn = "0007-1013",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "6",

}

A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks. / Bower, Matthew; Vlachopoulos, Panagiotis.

In: British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 49, No. 6, 11.2018, p. 981-997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks

AU - Bower,Matthew

AU - Vlachopoulos,Panagiotis

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Numerous models have been developed to help teachers efficiently and effectively design learning opportunities using new and emerging technologies. However, the literature to date makes little reference to the variation that exists within the models and frameworks as far as their scope, context, epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings and so on. In this paper, we critically contrast models of technology‐enhanced learning design in order to support educator selection of models, as well as to derive an overarching understanding of how learning design models may differ ontologically. A total of 21 models were selected from a systematic search of the technology‐enhanced learning design research literature. Findings indicated that technology‐enhanced learning design models can be differentiated according to whether they constitute a conceptual framework or a procedural method, their epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings, the level of granularity of the model, the extent to which contextual elements are considered, whether interactions between teachers and students are integral, whether guidance for selecting technologies is included and whether any sort of evaluation of the model has been conducted. The utility of each of these dimensions in terms of supporting technology‐enhanced learning design is considered, and the value more broadly of learning design models is critically discussed.

AB - Numerous models have been developed to help teachers efficiently and effectively design learning opportunities using new and emerging technologies. However, the literature to date makes little reference to the variation that exists within the models and frameworks as far as their scope, context, epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings and so on. In this paper, we critically contrast models of technology‐enhanced learning design in order to support educator selection of models, as well as to derive an overarching understanding of how learning design models may differ ontologically. A total of 21 models were selected from a systematic search of the technology‐enhanced learning design research literature. Findings indicated that technology‐enhanced learning design models can be differentiated according to whether they constitute a conceptual framework or a procedural method, their epistemological and pedagogical underpinnings, the level of granularity of the model, the extent to which contextual elements are considered, whether interactions between teachers and students are integral, whether guidance for selecting technologies is included and whether any sort of evaluation of the model has been conducted. The utility of each of these dimensions in terms of supporting technology‐enhanced learning design is considered, and the value more broadly of learning design models is critically discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053209495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjet.12668

DO - 10.1111/bjet.12668

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 981

EP - 997

JO - British Journal of Educational Technology

T2 - British Journal of Educational Technology

JF - British Journal of Educational Technology

SN - 0007-1013

IS - 6

ER -