Abstract
In view of recent scandals concerning executive remuneration and the current Australian government inquiry into its structure and regulation, this paper examines the foundation that agency theory provides for executive pay. The paper argues that agency theory assumptions concerning executive motivation and behaviour provide a flawed basis for the design of executive compensation. After examining evidence concerning the incentive effects of performance pay, and why incentive schemes may have adverse implications for firm performance, the paper considers the value of an alternative model, stewardship theory, for discussions about executive pay structures. The paper concludes that, given the limitations of agency theory as a conceptual basis for executive pay systems, a fundamental rethinking is required as to how executives are paid, and how corporate law regulates this aspect of governance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Work in progress |
Subtitle of host publication | crises, choices and continuity : proceedings of the 24th AIRAANZ conference |
Editors | Alison Barnes, Nikola Balnave, George Lafferty |
Place of Publication | Sydney |
Publisher | University of Western Sydney |
Pages | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 11 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780980608526 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand Conference (24th : 2010) - Sydney Duration: 3 Feb 2010 → 5 Feb 2010 |
Conference
Conference | Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand Conference (24th : 2010) |
---|---|
City | Sydney |
Period | 3/02/10 → 5/02/10 |