A cross-sectional study investigating the associations of person-organisation and person-group fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Organisational and workplace cultures are fundamental determinants of health systems performance; through better understanding of the dimensions of culture there is the potential to influence them, and subsequently improve safety and quality of care, as well as the experiences of both patients and staff. One promising conceptual framework for studying culture in healthcare is person-environment (P-E) fit. Comprising person-organisational (P-O) and person-group (P-G) components, P-E fit is defined as the extent to which individuals are compatible with their work environment. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of P-O and P-G fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare. Setting and participants: Participants (n=213) were staff and volunteers at 31 primary mental health facilities across six states of Australia. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Staff outcomes, comprising burnout (depersonalisation and emotional exhaustion), job satisfaction and work stress. Design: A multidimensional survey tool was used to measure P-O and P-G fit, and staff outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were used to test the associations between fit and outcome measures. Results: The regression analyses indicated that, based on a Bonferroni adjusted alpha value of α=00417, P-O fit accounted for 36.6% of the variability in satisfaction (F=8.951, p≤0.001); 27.7% in emotional exhaustion (F=6.766, p≤0.001); 32.8% in depersonalisation (F=8.646, p≤0.001); and 23.5% in work stress (F=5.439, p≤0.001). The P-G fit results were less conclusive, with P-G fit accounting for 15.8% of the variability in satisfaction (F=4.184, p≤0.001); 10.0% in emotional exhaustion (F=2.488, p=0.014); 28.6% in depersonalisation (F=8.945, p≤0.001); and 10.4% in work stress (F=2.590, p=0.032). There was no statistically significant increase in the variability accounted for when the interaction term of P-O and P-G fit was added to the regression. Conclusions: The findings highlight that staff's perception of their workplace and organisational culture can have implications for staff well-being.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere030669
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Cross-Sectional Studies
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care
Depersonalization
Organizational Culture
Workplace
Regression Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Job Satisfaction
Quality of Health Care
Health Facilities
Volunteers
Mental Health
Safety
Health

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • healthcare
  • organisational culture
  • person-environment fit
  • staff perceptions
  • workplace studies

Cite this

@article{9aa4d03e19ca47e4918e31aff0f7c6d1,
title = "A cross-sectional study investigating the associations of person-organisation and person-group fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare",
abstract = "Objectives: Organisational and workplace cultures are fundamental determinants of health systems performance; through better understanding of the dimensions of culture there is the potential to influence them, and subsequently improve safety and quality of care, as well as the experiences of both patients and staff. One promising conceptual framework for studying culture in healthcare is person-environment (P-E) fit. Comprising person-organisational (P-O) and person-group (P-G) components, P-E fit is defined as the extent to which individuals are compatible with their work environment. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of P-O and P-G fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare. Setting and participants: Participants (n=213) were staff and volunteers at 31 primary mental health facilities across six states of Australia. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Staff outcomes, comprising burnout (depersonalisation and emotional exhaustion), job satisfaction and work stress. Design: A multidimensional survey tool was used to measure P-O and P-G fit, and staff outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were used to test the associations between fit and outcome measures. Results: The regression analyses indicated that, based on a Bonferroni adjusted alpha value of α=00417, P-O fit accounted for 36.6{\%} of the variability in satisfaction (F=8.951, p≤0.001); 27.7{\%} in emotional exhaustion (F=6.766, p≤0.001); 32.8{\%} in depersonalisation (F=8.646, p≤0.001); and 23.5{\%} in work stress (F=5.439, p≤0.001). The P-G fit results were less conclusive, with P-G fit accounting for 15.8{\%} of the variability in satisfaction (F=4.184, p≤0.001); 10.0{\%} in emotional exhaustion (F=2.488, p=0.014); 28.6{\%} in depersonalisation (F=8.945, p≤0.001); and 10.4{\%} in work stress (F=2.590, p=0.032). There was no statistically significant increase in the variability accounted for when the interaction term of P-O and P-G fit was added to the regression. Conclusions: The findings highlight that staff's perception of their workplace and organisational culture can have implications for staff well-being.",
keywords = "healthcare, organisational culture, person-environment fit, staff perceptions, workplace studies",
author = "Jessica Herkes and Ellis, {Louise A.} and Kate Churruca and Jeffrey Braithwaite",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030669",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

A cross-sectional study investigating the associations of person-organisation and person-group fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare. / Herkes, Jessica; Ellis, Louise A.; Churruca, Kate; Braithwaite, Jeffrey.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 9, e030669, 24.09.2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional study investigating the associations of person-organisation and person-group fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare

AU - Herkes, Jessica

AU - Ellis, Louise A.

AU - Churruca, Kate

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2019/9/24

Y1 - 2019/9/24

N2 - Objectives: Organisational and workplace cultures are fundamental determinants of health systems performance; through better understanding of the dimensions of culture there is the potential to influence them, and subsequently improve safety and quality of care, as well as the experiences of both patients and staff. One promising conceptual framework for studying culture in healthcare is person-environment (P-E) fit. Comprising person-organisational (P-O) and person-group (P-G) components, P-E fit is defined as the extent to which individuals are compatible with their work environment. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of P-O and P-G fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare. Setting and participants: Participants (n=213) were staff and volunteers at 31 primary mental health facilities across six states of Australia. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Staff outcomes, comprising burnout (depersonalisation and emotional exhaustion), job satisfaction and work stress. Design: A multidimensional survey tool was used to measure P-O and P-G fit, and staff outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were used to test the associations between fit and outcome measures. Results: The regression analyses indicated that, based on a Bonferroni adjusted alpha value of α=00417, P-O fit accounted for 36.6% of the variability in satisfaction (F=8.951, p≤0.001); 27.7% in emotional exhaustion (F=6.766, p≤0.001); 32.8% in depersonalisation (F=8.646, p≤0.001); and 23.5% in work stress (F=5.439, p≤0.001). The P-G fit results were less conclusive, with P-G fit accounting for 15.8% of the variability in satisfaction (F=4.184, p≤0.001); 10.0% in emotional exhaustion (F=2.488, p=0.014); 28.6% in depersonalisation (F=8.945, p≤0.001); and 10.4% in work stress (F=2.590, p=0.032). There was no statistically significant increase in the variability accounted for when the interaction term of P-O and P-G fit was added to the regression. Conclusions: The findings highlight that staff's perception of their workplace and organisational culture can have implications for staff well-being.

AB - Objectives: Organisational and workplace cultures are fundamental determinants of health systems performance; through better understanding of the dimensions of culture there is the potential to influence them, and subsequently improve safety and quality of care, as well as the experiences of both patients and staff. One promising conceptual framework for studying culture in healthcare is person-environment (P-E) fit. Comprising person-organisational (P-O) and person-group (P-G) components, P-E fit is defined as the extent to which individuals are compatible with their work environment. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of P-O and P-G fit with staff outcomes in mental healthcare. Setting and participants: Participants (n=213) were staff and volunteers at 31 primary mental health facilities across six states of Australia. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Staff outcomes, comprising burnout (depersonalisation and emotional exhaustion), job satisfaction and work stress. Design: A multidimensional survey tool was used to measure P-O and P-G fit, and staff outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were used to test the associations between fit and outcome measures. Results: The regression analyses indicated that, based on a Bonferroni adjusted alpha value of α=00417, P-O fit accounted for 36.6% of the variability in satisfaction (F=8.951, p≤0.001); 27.7% in emotional exhaustion (F=6.766, p≤0.001); 32.8% in depersonalisation (F=8.646, p≤0.001); and 23.5% in work stress (F=5.439, p≤0.001). The P-G fit results were less conclusive, with P-G fit accounting for 15.8% of the variability in satisfaction (F=4.184, p≤0.001); 10.0% in emotional exhaustion (F=2.488, p=0.014); 28.6% in depersonalisation (F=8.945, p≤0.001); and 10.4% in work stress (F=2.590, p=0.032). There was no statistically significant increase in the variability accounted for when the interaction term of P-O and P-G fit was added to the regression. Conclusions: The findings highlight that staff's perception of their workplace and organisational culture can have implications for staff well-being.

KW - healthcare

KW - organisational culture

KW - person-environment fit

KW - staff perceptions

KW - workplace studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072616764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030669

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030669

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMJ Open

T2 - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e030669

ER -