A defence of quasi-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony

Two key intuitions regarding knowledge are explored: that knowledge is a kind of cognitive achievement and that knowledge excludes luck. It is claimed that a proper understanding of how these intuitions should inform our conception of knowledge leads to some surprising results, not just as regards the theory of knowledge more generally but also as regards the epistemology of testimonial knowledge. In particular, it is argued that this conception of knowledge motivates a new kind of proposal - quasi-reductionism - that can accommodate the motivations behind both reductionist and anti-reductionist accounts of the epistemology of testimonial knowledge.