Abstract
This commentary explores the implications of identifying an Antipodean economic geography distinct from an apparent Anglo-American hegemony. I explore Wray et al.'s (2013) proposal that there is a different kind of 'edginess' to the work produced by those on the underside of the world. Using an example from fieldwork in the highlands of northern Thailand, I suggest that identifying with perspectives of the so-called periphery, and striving to see those perspectives as, in fact, central is a crucial part of critical knowledge production.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 213-216 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Dialogues in Human Geography |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Antipodean geography
- identity
- looking for difference
- metropole
- politics of knowledge production
- Thailand
- Zomia