A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies

Rauno Parrila, Dean Dudley, Shuang Song, George K. Georgiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We provide a meta-analytic review of all group-comparison studies that used reading-level match design, were conducted in highly consistent European orthographies, included children with dyslexia younger than 13 years of age as participants, and included measures of one or more of the potential causes of dyslexia. We identified 21 studies meeting these criteria that examined one or more of phonological awareness, rapid naming, verbal short-term memory, or auditory temporal processing. A random effects model analysis showed first that the groups were matched imperfectly and they differed significantly in word reading measures not used for matching. Second, there were no significant differences between the individuals with dyslexia and their reading-level-matched controls in rapid naming, phonological memory, and auditory temporal processing. Finally, the analyses for phonological awareness showed a significant effect for comparisons that involved manipulating phonemes but not for tasks that involved manipulating syllables. The results are compatible with phonological deficit theories of dyslexia, but this conclusion is qualified by observed differences in reading skills and sample selection concerns.

LanguageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalAnnals of Dyslexia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
orthography
dyslexia
Meta-Analysis
Reading
model analysis
Short-Term Memory
Individuality
deficit
Research Design
Group
cause

Keywords

  • consistent orthographies
  • developmental dyslexia
  • meta-analysis
  • reading-level match design

Cite this

@article{ed6e08c06e2a45da862239b34ac815a3,
title = "A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies",
abstract = "We provide a meta-analytic review of all group-comparison studies that used reading-level match design, were conducted in highly consistent European orthographies, included children with dyslexia younger than 13 years of age as participants, and included measures of one or more of the potential causes of dyslexia. We identified 21 studies meeting these criteria that examined one or more of phonological awareness, rapid naming, verbal short-term memory, or auditory temporal processing. A random effects model analysis showed first that the groups were matched imperfectly and they differed significantly in word reading measures not used for matching. Second, there were no significant differences between the individuals with dyslexia and their reading-level-matched controls in rapid naming, phonological memory, and auditory temporal processing. Finally, the analyses for phonological awareness showed a significant effect for comparisons that involved manipulating phonemes but not for tasks that involved manipulating syllables. The results are compatible with phonological deficit theories of dyslexia, but this conclusion is qualified by observed differences in reading skills and sample selection concerns.",
keywords = "consistent orthographies, developmental dyslexia, meta-analysis, reading-level match design",
author = "Rauno Parrila and Dean Dudley and Shuang Song and Georgiou, {George K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s11881-019-00187-5",
language = "English",
journal = "Annals of Dyslexia",
issn = "0736-9387",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",

}

A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies. / Parrila, Rauno; Dudley, Dean; Song, Shuang; Georgiou, George K.

In: Annals of Dyslexia, 30.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies

AU - Parrila, Rauno

AU - Dudley, Dean

AU - Song, Shuang

AU - Georgiou, George K.

PY - 2019/10/30

Y1 - 2019/10/30

N2 - We provide a meta-analytic review of all group-comparison studies that used reading-level match design, were conducted in highly consistent European orthographies, included children with dyslexia younger than 13 years of age as participants, and included measures of one or more of the potential causes of dyslexia. We identified 21 studies meeting these criteria that examined one or more of phonological awareness, rapid naming, verbal short-term memory, or auditory temporal processing. A random effects model analysis showed first that the groups were matched imperfectly and they differed significantly in word reading measures not used for matching. Second, there were no significant differences between the individuals with dyslexia and their reading-level-matched controls in rapid naming, phonological memory, and auditory temporal processing. Finally, the analyses for phonological awareness showed a significant effect for comparisons that involved manipulating phonemes but not for tasks that involved manipulating syllables. The results are compatible with phonological deficit theories of dyslexia, but this conclusion is qualified by observed differences in reading skills and sample selection concerns.

AB - We provide a meta-analytic review of all group-comparison studies that used reading-level match design, were conducted in highly consistent European orthographies, included children with dyslexia younger than 13 years of age as participants, and included measures of one or more of the potential causes of dyslexia. We identified 21 studies meeting these criteria that examined one or more of phonological awareness, rapid naming, verbal short-term memory, or auditory temporal processing. A random effects model analysis showed first that the groups were matched imperfectly and they differed significantly in word reading measures not used for matching. Second, there were no significant differences between the individuals with dyslexia and their reading-level-matched controls in rapid naming, phonological memory, and auditory temporal processing. Finally, the analyses for phonological awareness showed a significant effect for comparisons that involved manipulating phonemes but not for tasks that involved manipulating syllables. The results are compatible with phonological deficit theories of dyslexia, but this conclusion is qualified by observed differences in reading skills and sample selection concerns.

KW - consistent orthographies

KW - developmental dyslexia

KW - meta-analysis

KW - reading-level match design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074730499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11881-019-00187-5

DO - 10.1007/s11881-019-00187-5

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of Dyslexia

T2 - Annals of Dyslexia

JF - Annals of Dyslexia

SN - 0736-9387

ER -