A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth

Brittany Killer, Kay Bussey, David J. Hawes, Caroline Hunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Over the last several years, researchers have become increasingly interested in the influence of moral factors on bullying behaviors. This is the first meta‐analytic review to exclusively examine the relationship between moral disengagement (MD) and the key bullying roles of bully, victim, defender, and bystander. Forty‐seven independent samples examining a total of 43,809 children/adolescents (aged 7–19) were included in this meta‐analysis. Results indicated a positive relationship between MD and bullying (r = 0.31; 95% CI [0.27, 0.34]), MD and victimization (r = 0.08; 95% CI [0.05, 0.12]), and a negative relationship between MD and defending (r = −0.11; 95% CI [−0.17, −0.04]). No significant relationship was found for MD and bystanding behavior. Moderators of bullying type (traditional vs. cyberbullying), reporting type (self vs. peer report), age, and gender were included in the analyses. The results are discussed in the context of relevant literature with particular emphasis on the importance of distinguishing between guilty and unconcerned bystanders, and the significant overlap between bullying and victimization in the cyber context.
LanguageEnglish
Pages450-462
Number of pages13
JournalAggressive Behavior
Volume45
Issue number4
Early online date21 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Bullying
Meta-Analysis
Crime Victims
Meta-analysis
Disengagement
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • bullying
  • bystanders
  • child
  • defenders
  • moral disengagement (MD)
  • victimization

Cite this

Killer, Brittany ; Bussey, Kay ; Hawes, David J. ; Hunt, Caroline. / A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. In: Aggressive Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 450-462.
@article{50fa2c453999406f81decdfa3195fcab,
title = "A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth",
abstract = "Over the last several years, researchers have become increasingly interested in the influence of moral factors on bullying behaviors. This is the first meta‐analytic review to exclusively examine the relationship between moral disengagement (MD) and the key bullying roles of bully, victim, defender, and bystander. Forty‐seven independent samples examining a total of 43,809 children/adolescents (aged 7–19) were included in this meta‐analysis. Results indicated a positive relationship between MD and bullying (r = 0.31; 95{\%} CI [0.27, 0.34]), MD and victimization (r = 0.08; 95{\%} CI [0.05, 0.12]), and a negative relationship between MD and defending (r = −0.11; 95{\%} CI [−0.17, −0.04]). No significant relationship was found for MD and bystanding behavior. Moderators of bullying type (traditional vs. cyberbullying), reporting type (self vs. peer report), age, and gender were included in the analyses. The results are discussed in the context of relevant literature with particular emphasis on the importance of distinguishing between guilty and unconcerned bystanders, and the significant overlap between bullying and victimization in the cyber context.",
keywords = "adolescent, bullying, bystanders, child, defenders, moral disengagement (MD), victimization",
author = "Brittany Killer and Kay Bussey and Hawes, {David J.} and Caroline Hunt",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/ab.21833",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "450--462",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "4",

}

A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. / Killer, Brittany; Bussey, Kay; Hawes, David J.; Hunt, Caroline.

In: Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 45, No. 4, 07.2019, p. 450-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth

AU - Killer, Brittany

AU - Bussey, Kay

AU - Hawes, David J.

AU - Hunt, Caroline

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Over the last several years, researchers have become increasingly interested in the influence of moral factors on bullying behaviors. This is the first meta‐analytic review to exclusively examine the relationship between moral disengagement (MD) and the key bullying roles of bully, victim, defender, and bystander. Forty‐seven independent samples examining a total of 43,809 children/adolescents (aged 7–19) were included in this meta‐analysis. Results indicated a positive relationship between MD and bullying (r = 0.31; 95% CI [0.27, 0.34]), MD and victimization (r = 0.08; 95% CI [0.05, 0.12]), and a negative relationship between MD and defending (r = −0.11; 95% CI [−0.17, −0.04]). No significant relationship was found for MD and bystanding behavior. Moderators of bullying type (traditional vs. cyberbullying), reporting type (self vs. peer report), age, and gender were included in the analyses. The results are discussed in the context of relevant literature with particular emphasis on the importance of distinguishing between guilty and unconcerned bystanders, and the significant overlap between bullying and victimization in the cyber context.

AB - Over the last several years, researchers have become increasingly interested in the influence of moral factors on bullying behaviors. This is the first meta‐analytic review to exclusively examine the relationship between moral disengagement (MD) and the key bullying roles of bully, victim, defender, and bystander. Forty‐seven independent samples examining a total of 43,809 children/adolescents (aged 7–19) were included in this meta‐analysis. Results indicated a positive relationship between MD and bullying (r = 0.31; 95% CI [0.27, 0.34]), MD and victimization (r = 0.08; 95% CI [0.05, 0.12]), and a negative relationship between MD and defending (r = −0.11; 95% CI [−0.17, −0.04]). No significant relationship was found for MD and bystanding behavior. Moderators of bullying type (traditional vs. cyberbullying), reporting type (self vs. peer report), age, and gender were included in the analyses. The results are discussed in the context of relevant literature with particular emphasis on the importance of distinguishing between guilty and unconcerned bystanders, and the significant overlap between bullying and victimization in the cyber context.

KW - adolescent

KW - bullying

KW - bystanders

KW - child

KW - defenders

KW - moral disengagement (MD)

KW - victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066799098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ab.21833

DO - 10.1002/ab.21833

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 450

EP - 462

JO - Aggressive Behavior

T2 - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

IS - 4

ER -