A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: ‘fit for purpose?: Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital’ (FLOURISH)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Good workspace design is key to the quality of work, safety, and wellbeing for workers, yet we lack vital knowledge about optimal hospital design to meet healthcare workforce needs. This study used novel mobile methods to examine the concept of Work-as-Done and the effect of workspace-use on healthcare professional practice, productivity, health and safety in an Australian university hospital.
Methods: This pilot study took place in one gastroenterological surgical unit between 2018 and 2019. Data collection involved 50 h of observations and informal conversations, followed by interpretation of five architectural plans and 45 photographs. Fieldnotes were thematically analysed and corroborated by analysis of visual data using a predefined taxonomy.
Results: Six themes were identified, revealing spaces that both support and hinder Work-as-Done. Fit-for-purpose spaces facilitated effective communication between staff, patients and families, conferred relative comfort and privacy, and supported effective teamwork. Unfit-for-purpose spaces were characterised by disruptions to work practices, disharmony among team members, and physical discomfort for staff. Staff employed workarounds to
manage unfit-for-purpose spaces.
Conclusion: The results identified negative impacts of negotiating unfit-for-purpose workspaces on the work andwellbeing of staff. While the use of workarounds and adaptations enable staff to maintain everyday working
practices, they can also lead to unexpected consequences. Results indicated the need to identify and support fitfor-purpose spaces and minimize the detrimental qualities of unfit-for-purpose spaces. This study showed that mobile methods were suitable for examining Work-as-Done in a fast-moving, adaptive hospital setting.
LanguageEnglish
Article number78
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume20
Issue number78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Organizational Efficiency
Health Facility Moving
Hospital Design and Construction
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Professional Practice
Privacy
Negotiating
Communication
Health

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Mobile methods
  • Work-as-imagined
  • Work-as-done
  • Photographs
  • Workforce
  • Workspace

Cite this

@article{dbeffed3d2e545429ad80068506cf3e8,
title = "A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: ‘fit for purpose?: Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital’ (FLOURISH)",
abstract = "Background: Good workspace design is key to the quality of work, safety, and wellbeing for workers, yet we lack vital knowledge about optimal hospital design to meet healthcare workforce needs. This study used novel mobile methods to examine the concept of Work-as-Done and the effect of workspace-use on healthcare professional practice, productivity, health and safety in an Australian university hospital. Methods: This pilot study took place in one gastroenterological surgical unit between 2018 and 2019. Data collection involved 50 h of observations and informal conversations, followed by interpretation of five architectural plans and 45 photographs. Fieldnotes were thematically analysed and corroborated by analysis of visual data using a predefined taxonomy. Results: Six themes were identified, revealing spaces that both support and hinder Work-as-Done. Fit-for-purpose spaces facilitated effective communication between staff, patients and families, conferred relative comfort and privacy, and supported effective teamwork. Unfit-for-purpose spaces were characterised by disruptions to work practices, disharmony among team members, and physical discomfort for staff. Staff employed workarounds tomanage unfit-for-purpose spaces. Conclusion: The results identified negative impacts of negotiating unfit-for-purpose workspaces on the work andwellbeing of staff. While the use of workarounds and adaptations enable staff to maintain everyday workingpractices, they can also lead to unexpected consequences. Results indicated the need to identify and support fitfor-purpose spaces and minimize the detrimental qualities of unfit-for-purpose spaces. This study showed that mobile methods were suitable for examining Work-as-Done in a fast-moving, adaptive hospital setting.",
keywords = "Mobile methods, Work-as-imagined, Work-as-done, Photographs, Workforce, Workspace",
author = "Frances Rapport and Emilie Francis-Auton and John Cartmill and Tayhla Ryder and Jeffrey Braithwaite and Robyn Clay-Williams",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "78",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: ‘fit for purpose?

T2 - BMC Health Services Research

AU - Rapport, Frances

AU - Francis-Auton, Emilie

AU - Cartmill, John

AU - Ryder, Tayhla

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

AU - Clay-Williams, Robyn

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Good workspace design is key to the quality of work, safety, and wellbeing for workers, yet we lack vital knowledge about optimal hospital design to meet healthcare workforce needs. This study used novel mobile methods to examine the concept of Work-as-Done and the effect of workspace-use on healthcare professional practice, productivity, health and safety in an Australian university hospital. Methods: This pilot study took place in one gastroenterological surgical unit between 2018 and 2019. Data collection involved 50 h of observations and informal conversations, followed by interpretation of five architectural plans and 45 photographs. Fieldnotes were thematically analysed and corroborated by analysis of visual data using a predefined taxonomy. Results: Six themes were identified, revealing spaces that both support and hinder Work-as-Done. Fit-for-purpose spaces facilitated effective communication between staff, patients and families, conferred relative comfort and privacy, and supported effective teamwork. Unfit-for-purpose spaces were characterised by disruptions to work practices, disharmony among team members, and physical discomfort for staff. Staff employed workarounds tomanage unfit-for-purpose spaces. Conclusion: The results identified negative impacts of negotiating unfit-for-purpose workspaces on the work andwellbeing of staff. While the use of workarounds and adaptations enable staff to maintain everyday workingpractices, they can also lead to unexpected consequences. Results indicated the need to identify and support fitfor-purpose spaces and minimize the detrimental qualities of unfit-for-purpose spaces. This study showed that mobile methods were suitable for examining Work-as-Done in a fast-moving, adaptive hospital setting.

AB - Background: Good workspace design is key to the quality of work, safety, and wellbeing for workers, yet we lack vital knowledge about optimal hospital design to meet healthcare workforce needs. This study used novel mobile methods to examine the concept of Work-as-Done and the effect of workspace-use on healthcare professional practice, productivity, health and safety in an Australian university hospital. Methods: This pilot study took place in one gastroenterological surgical unit between 2018 and 2019. Data collection involved 50 h of observations and informal conversations, followed by interpretation of five architectural plans and 45 photographs. Fieldnotes were thematically analysed and corroborated by analysis of visual data using a predefined taxonomy. Results: Six themes were identified, revealing spaces that both support and hinder Work-as-Done. Fit-for-purpose spaces facilitated effective communication between staff, patients and families, conferred relative comfort and privacy, and supported effective teamwork. Unfit-for-purpose spaces were characterised by disruptions to work practices, disharmony among team members, and physical discomfort for staff. Staff employed workarounds tomanage unfit-for-purpose spaces. Conclusion: The results identified negative impacts of negotiating unfit-for-purpose workspaces on the work andwellbeing of staff. While the use of workarounds and adaptations enable staff to maintain everyday workingpractices, they can also lead to unexpected consequences. Results indicated the need to identify and support fitfor-purpose spaces and minimize the detrimental qualities of unfit-for-purpose spaces. This study showed that mobile methods were suitable for examining Work-as-Done in a fast-moving, adaptive hospital setting.

KW - Mobile methods

KW - Work-as-imagined

KW - Work-as-done

KW - Photographs

KW - Workforce

KW - Workspace

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/9100002

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8

DO - 10.1186/s12913-020-4938-8

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 78

M1 - 78

ER -