TY - JOUR
T1 - A multi-service practice research network study of large group psychoeducational cognitive behavioural therapy
AU - Delgadillo, Jaime
AU - Kellett, Stephen
AU - Ali, Shehzad
AU - McMillan, Dean
AU - Barkham, Michael
AU - Saxon, David
AU - Donohoe, Gill
AU - Stonebank, Heather
AU - Mullaney, Sarah
AU - Eschoe, Patricia
AU - Thwaites, Richard
AU - Lucock, Mike
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Background This was a multi-service evaluation of the clinical and organisational effectiveness of large group psychoeducational CBT delivered within a stepped care model. Method Clinical outcomes for 4451 participants in 163 psychoeducational groups delivered across 5 services were analysed by calculating pre-post treatment anxiety (GAD-7) effect sizes (Cohen's d). Overall and between-service effects were compared to published efficacy benchmarks. Multilevel modelling was used to examine if variability in clinical outcomes was explained by differences in service, group and patient-level (case-mix) variables. Results The pooled GAD-7 (pre-post) effect size for all services was d = 0.70, which was consistent with efficacy benchmarks for guided self-help interventions (d = 0.69). One service had significantly smaller effects (d = 0.48), which was explained by differences in group treatment length and case-mix. Variability between groups (i.e., group effects) explained up to 3.6% of variance in treatment outcomes. Conclusions Large group psychoeducational CBT is clinically effective, organisationally efficient and consistent with a stepped care approach to service design. Clinical outcome differences between services were explained by group and patient variables.
AB - Background This was a multi-service evaluation of the clinical and organisational effectiveness of large group psychoeducational CBT delivered within a stepped care model. Method Clinical outcomes for 4451 participants in 163 psychoeducational groups delivered across 5 services were analysed by calculating pre-post treatment anxiety (GAD-7) effect sizes (Cohen's d). Overall and between-service effects were compared to published efficacy benchmarks. Multilevel modelling was used to examine if variability in clinical outcomes was explained by differences in service, group and patient-level (case-mix) variables. Results The pooled GAD-7 (pre-post) effect size for all services was d = 0.70, which was consistent with efficacy benchmarks for guided self-help interventions (d = 0.69). One service had significantly smaller effects (d = 0.48), which was explained by differences in group treatment length and case-mix. Variability between groups (i.e., group effects) explained up to 3.6% of variance in treatment outcomes. Conclusions Large group psychoeducational CBT is clinically effective, organisationally efficient and consistent with a stepped care approach to service design. Clinical outcome differences between services were explained by group and patient variables.
KW - Anxiety
KW - Depression
KW - IAPT
KW - Low intensity cognitive behavioural therapy
KW - Multilevel modelling
KW - Psychoeducation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988904915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 27685938
AN - SCOPUS:84988904915
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 87
SP - 155
EP - 161
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
ER -