A normative and structural analysis of the HGSHS: A with a large Australian sample

Kevin M. McConkey*, Amanda J. Barnier, Fiona L. Maccallum, Karen Bishop

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Australian norms and structural analysis for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) are presented. Results relating to score distributions, item difficulty level, and reliability were considered for a large sample of Australian students (N = 4,752) obtained over eight years of testing at Macquarie University. The aggregated sample, which represents the largest normative study of the HGSHS:A undertaken to date, was compared to recent normative studies conducted in Australia, Canada, Germany, and Spain, using both English and non-English versions of the test. In general, the aggregated sample was consistent with other reference samples, and results indicated that the HGSHS:A continues to function well as an instrument for the initial screening of hypnotisability. Further, the emergence of a three-factor solution from the principal components analysis was also consistent with previous factor-analytic studies, and suggested that performance on this scale reflects three dimensions of hypnotic responding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAustralian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A normative and structural analysis of the HGSHS: A with a large Australian sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this