A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems

Mohammad Yazdi, Arman Nedjati, Esmaeil Zarei, Rouzbeh Abbassi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) techniques methodically assess the likelihood, impact, and subsequently the risk of adverse events. In a typical QRA method, one of the main intentions is to identify the critical root events which mostly contribute to the risk of the top event (TE) and requiring subsequent corrective actions (CAs). Finding the critical events which contribute to the risk is significantly dependent on the assumptions and methods applied to integrate the probabilities of different events and these events may have really low probability of occurrence. Thus, the probability reduction of the critical root events and subsequently the system's failure does not lead to an optimal solution. For this reason, ranking the CAs without consideration of several aspects such as their influence on root events probability, inter-relationships, and direct/indirect cost, is not an appropriate approach. This study aims to introduce an approach to deal with the aforementioned situations. A novel extension to DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) named Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL is proposed on a common probabilistic safety analysis. As a case study, a collapse in an offshore facility platform (including 42 basic events and corresponding 30 CAs) is considered to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. The application of the model confirms its robustness in prioritizing critical root events and CAs compared with a conventional model, consideration of the influencing factors, and a dynamic and flexible structure.
LanguageEnglish
Pages119-136
Number of pages18
JournalSafety Science
Volume121
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Decision making
Safety
decision making
event
evaluation
Risk assessment
Flexible structures
risk assessment
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
ranking
costs

Keywords

  • Probabilistic risk assessment
  • Decision making
  • Critical event
  • Optimization
  • Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy
  • DEMATEL
  • Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL

Cite this

Yazdi, Mohammad ; Nedjati, Arman ; Zarei, Esmaeil ; Abbassi, Rouzbeh. / A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems. In: Safety Science. 2020 ; Vol. 121. pp. 119-136.
@article{34e213088ece4d78baa8df3c52fc5e1b,
title = "A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems",
abstract = "Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) techniques methodically assess the likelihood, impact, and subsequently the risk of adverse events. In a typical QRA method, one of the main intentions is to identify the critical root events which mostly contribute to the risk of the top event (TE) and requiring subsequent corrective actions (CAs). Finding the critical events which contribute to the risk is significantly dependent on the assumptions and methods applied to integrate the probabilities of different events and these events may have really low probability of occurrence. Thus, the probability reduction of the critical root events and subsequently the system's failure does not lead to an optimal solution. For this reason, ranking the CAs without consideration of several aspects such as their influence on root events probability, inter-relationships, and direct/indirect cost, is not an appropriate approach. This study aims to introduce an approach to deal with the aforementioned situations. A novel extension to DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) named Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL is proposed on a common probabilistic safety analysis. As a case study, a collapse in an offshore facility platform (including 42 basic events and corresponding 30 CAs) is considered to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. The application of the model confirms its robustness in prioritizing critical root events and CAs compared with a conventional model, consideration of the influencing factors, and a dynamic and flexible structure.",
keywords = "Probabilistic risk assessment, Decision making, Critical event, Optimization, Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy, DEMATEL, Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL",
author = "Mohammad Yazdi and Arman Nedjati and Esmaeil Zarei and Rouzbeh Abbassi",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "119--136",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems. / Yazdi, Mohammad; Nedjati, Arman; Zarei, Esmaeil; Abbassi, Rouzbeh.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 121, 01.2020, p. 119-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel extension of DEMATEL approach for probabilistic safety analysis in process systems

AU - Yazdi, Mohammad

AU - Nedjati, Arman

AU - Zarei, Esmaeil

AU - Abbassi, Rouzbeh

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) techniques methodically assess the likelihood, impact, and subsequently the risk of adverse events. In a typical QRA method, one of the main intentions is to identify the critical root events which mostly contribute to the risk of the top event (TE) and requiring subsequent corrective actions (CAs). Finding the critical events which contribute to the risk is significantly dependent on the assumptions and methods applied to integrate the probabilities of different events and these events may have really low probability of occurrence. Thus, the probability reduction of the critical root events and subsequently the system's failure does not lead to an optimal solution. For this reason, ranking the CAs without consideration of several aspects such as their influence on root events probability, inter-relationships, and direct/indirect cost, is not an appropriate approach. This study aims to introduce an approach to deal with the aforementioned situations. A novel extension to DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) named Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL is proposed on a common probabilistic safety analysis. As a case study, a collapse in an offshore facility platform (including 42 basic events and corresponding 30 CAs) is considered to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. The application of the model confirms its robustness in prioritizing critical root events and CAs compared with a conventional model, consideration of the influencing factors, and a dynamic and flexible structure.

AB - Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) techniques methodically assess the likelihood, impact, and subsequently the risk of adverse events. In a typical QRA method, one of the main intentions is to identify the critical root events which mostly contribute to the risk of the top event (TE) and requiring subsequent corrective actions (CAs). Finding the critical events which contribute to the risk is significantly dependent on the assumptions and methods applied to integrate the probabilities of different events and these events may have really low probability of occurrence. Thus, the probability reduction of the critical root events and subsequently the system's failure does not lead to an optimal solution. For this reason, ranking the CAs without consideration of several aspects such as their influence on root events probability, inter-relationships, and direct/indirect cost, is not an appropriate approach. This study aims to introduce an approach to deal with the aforementioned situations. A novel extension to DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) named Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL is proposed on a common probabilistic safety analysis. As a case study, a collapse in an offshore facility platform (including 42 basic events and corresponding 30 CAs) is considered to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. The application of the model confirms its robustness in prioritizing critical root events and CAs compared with a conventional model, consideration of the influencing factors, and a dynamic and flexible structure.

KW - Probabilistic risk assessment

KW - Decision making

KW - Critical event

KW - Optimization

KW - Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy

KW - DEMATEL

KW - Corrective actions, Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072210923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 119

EP - 136

JO - Safety Science

T2 - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -