A poorly mixed mantle transition zone and its thermal state inferred from seismic waves

Lauren Waszek*, Benoit Tauzin, Nicholas C. Schmerr, Maxim D. Ballmer, Juan Carlos Afonso

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    35 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The abrupt changes in mineralogical properties across the Earth’s mantle transition zone substantially impact convection and thermochemical fluxes between the upper and lower mantle. While the 410-km discontinuity at the top of the mantle transition zone is detected with all types of seismic waves, the 660-km boundary is mostly invisible to underside P-wave reflections (P660P). The cause for this observation is debated. The dissociation of ringwoodite and garnet into lower-mantle minerals both contribute to the ‘660’ visibility; only the garnet reaction favours material exchanges across the discontinuity. Here, we combine large datasets of SS and PP precursors, mineralogical modelling and data-mining techniques to obtain a global thermal map of the mantle transition zone, and explain the lack of P660P visibility. We find that its prevalent absence requires a chemically unequilibrated mantle, and its visibility in few locations is associated with potential temperatures greater than 1,800 K. Such temperatures occur in approximately 0.6% of Earth, indicating that the 660 is dominated by ringwoodite decomposition, which tends to impede mantle flow. We find broad regions with elevated temperatures beneath the Pacific surrounded by major volcanic hotspots, indicating plume retention and ponding of hot materials in the mantle transition zone.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)949-955
    Number of pages10
    JournalNature Geoscience
    Volume14
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A poorly mixed mantle transition zone and its thermal state inferred from seismic waves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this