A Promise made is a debt unpaid

the case of Orchard v Curtis, Supreme Court of Van Diemen's Land, 12 July 1833

John F. Bourke, Rosemary Lucadou-Wells

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

    51 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    An exploration into colonial jurisprudence illustrated by the case of Orchard v Curtis, SC of Van Diemen's Land 12 July 1833.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)301-311
    Number of pages11
    JournalMacquarie journal of business law
    Volume6
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher version archived with the permission of the Dean, Division of Law, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.

    Keywords

    • colonial jurisprudence
    • courts
    • case law

    Access to Document

      Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Promise made is a debt unpaid: the case of Orchard v Curtis, Supreme Court of Van Diemen's Land, 12 July 1833'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this