A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting

Elias Moisidis, Tim Heath, Catherine Boorer, Kevin Ho, Anand K. Deva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eight women) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm 2 (range, 35 to 450 cm 2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.

LanguageEnglish
Pages917-922
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume114
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skin Transplantation
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Transplants
Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Bandages
Skin
Subcutaneous Fat
Lost to Follow-Up
Fascia
Random Allocation
Inpatients
Muscles

Cite this

@article{ac5b1da5391b427a987fe36a51c99eff,
title = "A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting",
abstract = "Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eight women) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm 2 (range, 35 to 450 cm 2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.",
author = "Elias Moisidis and Tim Heath and Catherine Boorer and Kevin Ho and Deva, {Anand K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/01.PRS.0000133168.57199.E1",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "917--922",
journal = "Plastic and reconstructive surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. / Moisidis, Elias; Heath, Tim; Boorer, Catherine; Ho, Kevin; Deva, Anand K.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 114, No. 4, 15.09.2004, p. 917-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting

AU - Moisidis,Elias

AU - Heath,Tim

AU - Boorer,Catherine

AU - Ho,Kevin

AU - Deva,Anand K.

PY - 2004/9/15

Y1 - 2004/9/15

N2 - Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eight women) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm 2 (range, 35 to 450 cm 2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.

AB - Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eight women) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm 2 (range, 35 to 450 cm 2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5444256424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000133168.57199.E1

DO - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000133168.57199.E1

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 917

EP - 922

JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

T2 - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -