A proximal perspective on disgust

Richard J. Stevenson, Trevor I. Case, Megan J. Oaten, Lorenzo Stafford, Supreet Saluja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.
LanguageEnglish
Pages209-225
Number of pages17
JournalEmotion Review
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date23 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Cues
Emotions
Disgust
Proximal

Cite this

Stevenson, Richard J. ; Case, Trevor I. ; Oaten, Megan J. ; Stafford, Lorenzo ; Saluja, Supreet. / A proximal perspective on disgust. In: Emotion Review. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 209-225.
@article{b535a5e78f2941a6b8ffee9e1ae3de0b,
title = "A proximal perspective on disgust",
abstract = "The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.",
keywords = "disgust, emotion, gustation, olfaction, pain, somatosensation, state",
author = "Stevenson, {Richard J.} and Case, {Trevor I.} and Oaten, {Megan J.} and Lorenzo Stafford and Supreet Saluja",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1754073919853355",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "209--225",
journal = "Emotion Review",
issn = "1754-0739",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

A proximal perspective on disgust. / Stevenson, Richard J.; Case, Trevor I.; Oaten, Megan J.; Stafford, Lorenzo; Saluja, Supreet.

In: Emotion Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.07.2019, p. 209-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A proximal perspective on disgust

AU - Stevenson,Richard J.

AU - Case,Trevor I.

AU - Oaten,Megan J.

AU - Stafford,Lorenzo

AU - Saluja,Supreet

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.

AB - The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.

KW - disgust

KW - emotion

KW - gustation

KW - olfaction

KW - pain

KW - somatosensation

KW - state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068103720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1754073919853355

DO - 10.1177/1754073919853355

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 209

EP - 225

JO - Emotion Review

T2 - Emotion Review

JF - Emotion Review

SN - 1754-0739

IS - 3

ER -