A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images

Mariano Cabezas, Arnau Oliver*, Xavier Lladó, Jordi Freixenet, Meritxell Bach Cuadra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

346 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normal and abnormal brains can be segmented by registering the target image with an atlas. Here, an atlas is defined as the combination of an intensity image (template) and its segmented image (the atlas labels). After registering the atlas template and the target image, the atlas labels are propagated to the target image. We define this process as atlas-based segmentation. In recent years, researchers have investigated registration algorithms to match atlases to query subjects and also strategies for atlas construction. In this paper we present a review of the automated approaches for atlas-based segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images. We aim to point out the strengths and weaknesses of atlas-based methods and suggest new research directions. We use two different criteria to present the methods. First, we refer to the algorithms according to their atlas-based strategy: label propagation, multi-atlas methods, and probabilistic techniques. Subsequently, we classify the methods according to their medical target: the brain and its internal structures, tissue segmentation in healthy subjects, tissue segmentation in fetus, neonates and elderly subjects, and segmentation of damaged brains. A quantitative comparison of the results reported in the literature is also presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e158-e177
Number of pages20
JournalComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • atlas
  • automated methods
  • brain
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • segmentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this