Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies

Francis Lau*, Craig Kuziemsky, Morgan Price, Jesse Gardner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to consolidate existing evidence from published systematic reviews on health information system (HIS) evaluation studies to inform HIS practice and research. Fifty reviews published during 1994-2008 were selected for meta-level synthesis. These reviews covered five areas: medication management, preventive care, health conditions, data quality, and care process/outcome. After reconciliation for duplicates, 1276 HIS studies were arrived at as the non-overlapping corpus. On the basis of a subset of 287 controlled HIS studies, there is some evidence for improved quality of care, but in varying degrees across topic areas. For instance, 31/43 (72%) controlled HIS studies had positive results using preventive care reminders, mostly through guideline adherence such as immunization and health screening. Key factors that influence HIS success included having in-house systems, developers as users, integrated decision support and benchmark practices, and addressing such contextual issues as provider knowledge and perception, incentives, and legislation/policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-645
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this