A revised model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings: a scoping review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty is a ubiquitous and dynamic presence throughout healthcare systems and encounters, affecting the quality and safety of care. Although previous research has attempted to categorize varieties of uncertainty, it is not clear if these classifications are applicable across various healthcare settings. Objective: The purpose of this review was to examine the applicability of the issues of uncertainty delineated in an established taxonomy across diverse healthcare domains, professions, and countries and to consider the complexity of these issues. Methods: Drawing on empirical research from three databases, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify types of uncertainty experienced by healthcare professionals. A framework synthesis design was employed to review and synthesize the literature across multiple healthcare settings. Results: The search identified 2285 articles, of which 94 met the inclusion criteria. Findings from included studies suggested professional uncertainty in healthcare is complex and pervasive. On the basis of our inability to categorize some studies in the issues of uncertainty outlined in the existing taxonomy, we proposed a revised model of uncertainty for healthcare professionals. Conclusions: The revised model of uncertainty, the model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings (MUCH-S), is applicable to various healthcare ecosystems and proposes a reflexive archetype that recognizes different issues of uncertainty while establishing that these are often interrelated in healthcare systems. This review offers healthcare professionals greater levels of understanding of this complex phenomenon and may support more informed and reflective decision-making, assisting them to better navigate uncertainties experienced in healthcare workplaces.

LanguageEnglish
Pages176-182
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume25
Issue number2
Early online date22 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Delivery of Health Care
Empirical Research
Quality of Health Care
Workplace
Ecosystem
Decision Making
Databases
Safety

Keywords

  • complexity
  • healthcare
  • healthcare professional
  • uncertainty

Cite this

@article{1cf9f409cf29462aba37c05fe4a889eb,
title = "A revised model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings: a scoping review",
abstract = "Background: Uncertainty is a ubiquitous and dynamic presence throughout healthcare systems and encounters, affecting the quality and safety of care. Although previous research has attempted to categorize varieties of uncertainty, it is not clear if these classifications are applicable across various healthcare settings. Objective: The purpose of this review was to examine the applicability of the issues of uncertainty delineated in an established taxonomy across diverse healthcare domains, professions, and countries and to consider the complexity of these issues. Methods: Drawing on empirical research from three databases, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify types of uncertainty experienced by healthcare professionals. A framework synthesis design was employed to review and synthesize the literature across multiple healthcare settings. Results: The search identified 2285 articles, of which 94 met the inclusion criteria. Findings from included studies suggested professional uncertainty in healthcare is complex and pervasive. On the basis of our inability to categorize some studies in the issues of uncertainty outlined in the existing taxonomy, we proposed a revised model of uncertainty for healthcare professionals. Conclusions: The revised model of uncertainty, the model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings (MUCH-S), is applicable to various healthcare ecosystems and proposes a reflexive archetype that recognizes different issues of uncertainty while establishing that these are often interrelated in healthcare systems. This review offers healthcare professionals greater levels of understanding of this complex phenomenon and may support more informed and reflective decision-making, assisting them to better navigate uncertainties experienced in healthcare workplaces.",
keywords = "complexity, healthcare, healthcare professional, uncertainty",
author = "Chiara Pomare and Kate Churruca and Ellis, {Louise A.} and Long, {Janet C.} and Jeffrey Braithwaite",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/jep.13079",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "176--182",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A revised model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings

T2 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

AU - Pomare, Chiara

AU - Churruca, Kate

AU - Ellis, Louise A.

AU - Long, Janet C.

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Background: Uncertainty is a ubiquitous and dynamic presence throughout healthcare systems and encounters, affecting the quality and safety of care. Although previous research has attempted to categorize varieties of uncertainty, it is not clear if these classifications are applicable across various healthcare settings. Objective: The purpose of this review was to examine the applicability of the issues of uncertainty delineated in an established taxonomy across diverse healthcare domains, professions, and countries and to consider the complexity of these issues. Methods: Drawing on empirical research from three databases, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify types of uncertainty experienced by healthcare professionals. A framework synthesis design was employed to review and synthesize the literature across multiple healthcare settings. Results: The search identified 2285 articles, of which 94 met the inclusion criteria. Findings from included studies suggested professional uncertainty in healthcare is complex and pervasive. On the basis of our inability to categorize some studies in the issues of uncertainty outlined in the existing taxonomy, we proposed a revised model of uncertainty for healthcare professionals. Conclusions: The revised model of uncertainty, the model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings (MUCH-S), is applicable to various healthcare ecosystems and proposes a reflexive archetype that recognizes different issues of uncertainty while establishing that these are often interrelated in healthcare systems. This review offers healthcare professionals greater levels of understanding of this complex phenomenon and may support more informed and reflective decision-making, assisting them to better navigate uncertainties experienced in healthcare workplaces.

AB - Background: Uncertainty is a ubiquitous and dynamic presence throughout healthcare systems and encounters, affecting the quality and safety of care. Although previous research has attempted to categorize varieties of uncertainty, it is not clear if these classifications are applicable across various healthcare settings. Objective: The purpose of this review was to examine the applicability of the issues of uncertainty delineated in an established taxonomy across diverse healthcare domains, professions, and countries and to consider the complexity of these issues. Methods: Drawing on empirical research from three databases, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify types of uncertainty experienced by healthcare professionals. A framework synthesis design was employed to review and synthesize the literature across multiple healthcare settings. Results: The search identified 2285 articles, of which 94 met the inclusion criteria. Findings from included studies suggested professional uncertainty in healthcare is complex and pervasive. On the basis of our inability to categorize some studies in the issues of uncertainty outlined in the existing taxonomy, we proposed a revised model of uncertainty for healthcare professionals. Conclusions: The revised model of uncertainty, the model of uncertainty in complex healthcare settings (MUCH-S), is applicable to various healthcare ecosystems and proposes a reflexive archetype that recognizes different issues of uncertainty while establishing that these are often interrelated in healthcare systems. This review offers healthcare professionals greater levels of understanding of this complex phenomenon and may support more informed and reflective decision-making, assisting them to better navigate uncertainties experienced in healthcare workplaces.

KW - complexity

KW - healthcare

KW - healthcare professional

KW - uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056996694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/9100002

U2 - 10.1111/jep.13079

DO - 10.1111/jep.13079

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 176

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 2

ER -