A Right to respond? Monopolisation of 'voice' in CMS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores the power effects of, and possible justifications for, the differential 'voice' and 'silence' accorded academic and non-academic subjects within Critical Management Studies (CMS). I explore these issues through a discussion of the practice of 'giving voice' to some subjects critiqued in CMS journal articles by providing them with the opportunity to publish a 'response'. I question the justification for extending this right only to academic subjects, and use this example to provoke CMS to question further its institutional orientation to issues of voice and silence in relation to the non-academic research subject.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-120
Number of pages20
JournalEphemera: theory and politics in organization
Volume4
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Right to respond? Monopolisation of 'voice' in CMS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this