Abstract
The two central arguments of this paper are symmetrical: language science is a science for verbal art, and Elizabeth Gaskell's verbal art offers a way of understanding the historical method pioneered by Marx and using it to develop language science in turn. The argument unfolds on three different timescales, examining the logogenetic development of one work, the ontogenetic development of one writer, and the sociogenetic development of one genre, namely the nineteenth century social-realist novel. Taking a logogenetic view, we use a Hallidayan linguistic framework to show how Elizabeth Gaskell's treatment of inter-class dialogue differs from that of the man who was probably her first Marxist critic—Marx himself. Taking an ontogenetic view, we use Hasan's distinction between theme, verbalization, and symbolic articulation to compare an earlier industrial novel by Gaskell with a later one. Taking a sociogenetic view, we argue that Gaskell's role in the development of the novel genre may also be understood through a comparative linguistic contrast between her work and previous and succeeding literary genres.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 92-102 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Language Sciences |
Volume | 70 |
Early online date | 10 May 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- verbal art
- Karl Marx
- Elizabeth Gaskell
- political economy
- industrial novels
- Ruqaiya Hasan
- systemic-functional linguistics