Abstract
We examine whether CEO compensation increases in firms located near a terrorist attack. We first replicate and confirm the findings of Dai et al. (2020) in the US setting using the original sample and an extended sample. Consistent with Dai et al. (2020) we document a causal link between terrorist attack proximity and CEO compensation, suggesting that CEOs use their bargaining power to extract additional compensation after a deterioration in their external environment. When we extend this analysis to the Australian setting, we find a positive association between CEO compensation and terrorist attack proximity, only for CEOs with higher bargaining power. Specifically, we find that Australian CEOs negotiate higher compensation after a terrorist attack when (i) board monitoring is weak and consists of majority non-independent directors and (ii) the local executive labor market provides more employment opportunities to the CEO.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101935 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Pacific-Basin Finance Journal |
| Volume | 77 |
| Early online date | 11 Jan 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |
Bibliographical note
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Terrorist attacks
- CEO compensation
- Board independence
- Executive labor market
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A shock to CEOs' external environment: terrorist attacks and CEO pay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver