Abstract
This chapter presents the findings of a study that explored the linguistic coping strategies of Australian Sign Language (Auslan)-English interpreters (Napier, 2001). The intention of the study was to introduce, for the first time, a sociolinguistic analysis of interpreters working between Auslan and English. Although many academic studies have been completed that focus on signed language interpreting from a sociolinguistic point of view (e.g., Cokely, 1985; Davis, 1990; Metzger, 1995; Roy, 1989), all of them concentrate on the practices of interpreters working between American Sign Language (ASL) and English. Reference to these studies no doubt provides a wider scope of knowledge, and assumptions can be made about the validity of research in relation to Auslan interpreting. Nonetheless, an in-depth sociolinguistic study of Auslan interpreters and their approach to interpreting was much needed to examine this group's practices in an Australian context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | From topic boundaries to omission |
| Subtitle of host publication | New research on interpretation |
| Editors | Melanie Metzger, Steven Collins, Valerie Dively, Risa Shaw |
| Place of Publication | Washington |
| Publisher | Gallaudet University Press |
| Pages | 99-153 |
| Number of pages | 55 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781563686405 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A sociolinguistic analysis of the occurrence and types of omissions produced by Australian Sign Language-English interpreters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver