A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities

Piet de Jong

doi:10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0

A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities

Piet de Jong^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the logarithmic least squares (LLSM) approach to Saaty's (Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 5, 234-281) scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. It is argued that statistical criteria are important in deciding the scaling method controversy. It is shown that LLSM is statistically optimal under a number of realistic and practical models. Variances and covariances of parameter estimates are derived. The covariance matrix associated with overall priority differences is also developed. These results allow for a significance analysis of apparent priority differences.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	467-478
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Volume	28
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0
Publication status	Published - 1984
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{c05554ca16c04b42ba6718ecd648bb9d,

title = "A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities",

abstract = "This paper investigates the logarithmic least squares (LLSM) approach to Saaty's (Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 5, 234-281) scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. It is argued that statistical criteria are important in deciding the scaling method controversy. It is shown that LLSM is statistically optimal under a number of realistic and practical models. Variances and covariances of parameter estimates are derived. The covariance matrix associated with overall priority differences is also developed. These results allow for a significance analysis of apparent priority differences.",

author = "{de Jong}, Piet",

year = "1984",

doi = "10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "467--478",

journal = "Journal of Mathematical Psychology",

issn = "0022-2496",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities

AU - de Jong, Piet

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - This paper investigates the logarithmic least squares (LLSM) approach to Saaty's (Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 5, 234-281) scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. It is argued that statistical criteria are important in deciding the scaling method controversy. It is shown that LLSM is statistically optimal under a number of realistic and practical models. Variances and covariances of parameter estimates are derived. The covariance matrix associated with overall priority differences is also developed. These results allow for a significance analysis of apparent priority differences.

AB - This paper investigates the logarithmic least squares (LLSM) approach to Saaty's (Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 5, 234-281) scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. It is argued that statistical criteria are important in deciding the scaling method controversy. It is shown that LLSM is statistically optimal under a number of realistic and practical models. Variances and covariances of parameter estimates are derived. The covariance matrix associated with overall priority differences is also developed. These results allow for a significance analysis of apparent priority differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001270743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0

DO - 10.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001270743

VL - 28

SP - 467

EP - 478

JO - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

JF - Journal of Mathematical Psychology

SN - 0022-2496

IS - 4

ER -

A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this