A strategic impact assessment of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Hydropower is the widely used source of clean energy which includes some hazardous emissions that affect human health, ecosystems, and resources. However, in spite of an enormous amount of hydropower generation in Europe, no research has been carried out in evaluating the hazardous emissions from the plants located in alpine and non-alpine areas. Therefore, this paper will analyse the comparative environmental impacts of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe by a systematic life-cycle assessment (LCA)approach. The impacts are estimated by the ReCiPe 2016, Impact 2002+, Eco-points 97 methods under a number of effect-assessing indicators such as global warming, ozone formation, eco-toxicity, water consumption, acidification, eutrophication, ionizing radiation, carcinogenic radiation, ozone depletion, and land use. Moreover, the fossil-fuel-based power consumptions and the greenhouse-gas emissions in the life-cycle of hydropower plants in both locations are estimated using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED)and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)methods, respectively. The outcomes reveal that hydropower plants of alpine regions offer a better environmental profile for the global-warming indicator (2.97×10 -5 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ)than non-alpine plants (3.92×10 -4 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ), but the effects are nearly identical for the other indicators. Overall, the hydropower plants of non-alpine regions are responsible for climate change with a rate 10 times as high as for alpine ones. The findings of this research will play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable production of hydropower, especially the full potentials of the alpine region, and thus leading towards environmentally friendly clean renewable electricity generation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages198-214
Number of pages17
JournalApplied Energy
Volume250
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Global warming
Climate change
Ozone
Life cycle
Eutrophication
Acidification
Ionizing radiation
Gas emissions
Fossil fuels
Greenhouse gases
Land use
Ecosystems
Environmental impact
Toxicity
Electric power utilization
Electricity
Health
Radiation
global warming
life cycle

Cite this

@article{7ffc53ec458f4c8b840d0f997e1a4273,
title = "A strategic impact assessment of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe",
abstract = "Hydropower is the widely used source of clean energy which includes some hazardous emissions that affect human health, ecosystems, and resources. However, in spite of an enormous amount of hydropower generation in Europe, no research has been carried out in evaluating the hazardous emissions from the plants located in alpine and non-alpine areas. Therefore, this paper will analyse the comparative environmental impacts of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe by a systematic life-cycle assessment (LCA)approach. The impacts are estimated by the ReCiPe 2016, Impact 2002+, Eco-points 97 methods under a number of effect-assessing indicators such as global warming, ozone formation, eco-toxicity, water consumption, acidification, eutrophication, ionizing radiation, carcinogenic radiation, ozone depletion, and land use. Moreover, the fossil-fuel-based power consumptions and the greenhouse-gas emissions in the life-cycle of hydropower plants in both locations are estimated using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED)and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)methods, respectively. The outcomes reveal that hydropower plants of alpine regions offer a better environmental profile for the global-warming indicator (2.97×10 -5 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ)than non-alpine plants (3.92×10 -4 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ), but the effects are nearly identical for the other indicators. Overall, the hydropower plants of non-alpine regions are responsible for climate change with a rate 10 times as high as for alpine ones. The findings of this research will play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable production of hydropower, especially the full potentials of the alpine region, and thus leading towards environmentally friendly clean renewable electricity generation.",
keywords = "Hydropower plant, Alpine and non-alpine regions, Life-cycle assessment, Environmental performance evaluation, Uncertainty analysis",
author = "Mahmud, {M. A. Parvez} and Nazmul Huda and Farjana, {Shahjadi Hisan} and Candace Lang",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.007",
language = "English",
volume = "250",
pages = "198--214",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A strategic impact assessment of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe. / Mahmud, M. A. Parvez; Huda, Nazmul; Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan; Lang, Candace.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 250, 15.09.2019, p. 198-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A strategic impact assessment of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe

AU - Mahmud,M. A. Parvez

AU - Huda,Nazmul

AU - Farjana,Shahjadi Hisan

AU - Lang,Candace

PY - 2019/9/15

Y1 - 2019/9/15

N2 - Hydropower is the widely used source of clean energy which includes some hazardous emissions that affect human health, ecosystems, and resources. However, in spite of an enormous amount of hydropower generation in Europe, no research has been carried out in evaluating the hazardous emissions from the plants located in alpine and non-alpine areas. Therefore, this paper will analyse the comparative environmental impacts of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe by a systematic life-cycle assessment (LCA)approach. The impacts are estimated by the ReCiPe 2016, Impact 2002+, Eco-points 97 methods under a number of effect-assessing indicators such as global warming, ozone formation, eco-toxicity, water consumption, acidification, eutrophication, ionizing radiation, carcinogenic radiation, ozone depletion, and land use. Moreover, the fossil-fuel-based power consumptions and the greenhouse-gas emissions in the life-cycle of hydropower plants in both locations are estimated using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED)and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)methods, respectively. The outcomes reveal that hydropower plants of alpine regions offer a better environmental profile for the global-warming indicator (2.97×10 -5 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ)than non-alpine plants (3.92×10 -4 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ), but the effects are nearly identical for the other indicators. Overall, the hydropower plants of non-alpine regions are responsible for climate change with a rate 10 times as high as for alpine ones. The findings of this research will play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable production of hydropower, especially the full potentials of the alpine region, and thus leading towards environmentally friendly clean renewable electricity generation.

AB - Hydropower is the widely used source of clean energy which includes some hazardous emissions that affect human health, ecosystems, and resources. However, in spite of an enormous amount of hydropower generation in Europe, no research has been carried out in evaluating the hazardous emissions from the plants located in alpine and non-alpine areas. Therefore, this paper will analyse the comparative environmental impacts of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe by a systematic life-cycle assessment (LCA)approach. The impacts are estimated by the ReCiPe 2016, Impact 2002+, Eco-points 97 methods under a number of effect-assessing indicators such as global warming, ozone formation, eco-toxicity, water consumption, acidification, eutrophication, ionizing radiation, carcinogenic radiation, ozone depletion, and land use. Moreover, the fossil-fuel-based power consumptions and the greenhouse-gas emissions in the life-cycle of hydropower plants in both locations are estimated using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED)and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)methods, respectively. The outcomes reveal that hydropower plants of alpine regions offer a better environmental profile for the global-warming indicator (2.97×10 -5 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ)than non-alpine plants (3.92×10 -4 kg CO 2 -eq/MJ), but the effects are nearly identical for the other indicators. Overall, the hydropower plants of non-alpine regions are responsible for climate change with a rate 10 times as high as for alpine ones. The findings of this research will play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable production of hydropower, especially the full potentials of the alpine region, and thus leading towards environmentally friendly clean renewable electricity generation.

KW - Hydropower plant

KW - Alpine and non-alpine regions

KW - Life-cycle assessment

KW - Environmental performance evaluation

KW - Uncertainty analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065256464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 250

SP - 198

EP - 214

JO - Applied Energy

T2 - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

ER -