TY - JOUR
T1 - A tale of two centres
T2 - a cross-institutional peer review of integrated assessment use in direct entry programs
AU - Dinneen, Cara
AU - Gardiner, John
AU - Sameer, Mohammed
AU - Koay, Jeremy
AU - Cullen, Sharon
AU - Hickey, Tony
AU - Vazquez, Alejandra
AU - Lara, Jose
AU - Mazzei, Mariela
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Direct Entry Programs (DEPs) at Australian universities are designed to enhance students’ English language and academic skills, with the primary goals of preparing and assuring students’ readiness for university studies. Given that university tasks often require the integration of language skills (e.g., writing assignments using information from lectures, articles, and textbooks), this paper proposes the use of integrated assessment tasks in DEPs to increase the authenticity in their assessment approach by using tasks that replicate actual university learning, teaching, and assessment practices. To encourage the shift from standard practice of separate skills testing to integrated assessment, we present key findings of a literature review in integrated assessment use in language programs and show how integrated assessment is implemented in two institutions in Sydney, Australia. The paper also highlights advantages of cross-institutional peer review and proposes an argument-based validity framework for test design that language centres can use to guide good practice.
AB - Direct Entry Programs (DEPs) at Australian universities are designed to enhance students’ English language and academic skills, with the primary goals of preparing and assuring students’ readiness for university studies. Given that university tasks often require the integration of language skills (e.g., writing assignments using information from lectures, articles, and textbooks), this paper proposes the use of integrated assessment tasks in DEPs to increase the authenticity in their assessment approach by using tasks that replicate actual university learning, teaching, and assessment practices. To encourage the shift from standard practice of separate skills testing to integrated assessment, we present key findings of a literature review in integrated assessment use in language programs and show how integrated assessment is implemented in two institutions in Sydney, Australia. The paper also highlights advantages of cross-institutional peer review and proposes an argument-based validity framework for test design that language centres can use to guide good practice.
KW - direct entry
KW - English language proficiency
KW - integrated assessment
KW - peer review
KW - university preparation
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200992779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.61504/OKTA3655
DO - 10.61504/OKTA3655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200992779
SN - 1444-4496
VL - 40
SP - 71
EP - 98
JO - English Australia Journal
JF - English Australia Journal
IS - 2
ER -