Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Voice for the Injured: Bettina Arndt and Australian Family Law

Kate Gleeson*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article analyses the nature and effect of the campaign against the Family Court led by social commentator Bettina Arndt from 1995 to 2006, in the context of the men's rights agenda and the politics of anti-feminist backlash. It documents the changes to Australian family law and the workings of the Family Court under the Howard government, as a result of this campaign, in order to understand the politics of backlash in the context of Wendy Brown's States of Injury theory of 1995. In this analysis, the conservative men's rights agenda is understood as a reaction to structural and economic adjustments associated with neoliberal reforms, especially labour market regulation. But this context, of structural adjustment, is distorted in the rhetoric and focus of campaigns characterised by anti-feminist backlash, such as that directed at the Family Court in Australia. The example of Arndt and her championing of men's rights in this arena is presented as a means by which to compare the different experiences and traditions of feminism in Australia and America, and the associated politics of backlash in each nation, all of which have had a profound influence on Arndt's outlook and work.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)375-397
    Number of pages23
    JournalAustralian Feminist Studies
    Volume28
    Issue number78
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Voice for the Injured: Bettina Arndt and Australian Family Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this