Abstract
Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy was recently recommended by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) for listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for adults with severe GH deficiency and impaired quality of life. This approval was significant for two reasons. First, the application was initiated and coordinated by a health professional working group, who prepared a ‘public interest’ submission to PBAC. Second, it resulted in a recommendation to subsidise therapy for a rare disease after two prior rejections on the basis of uncertainty about efficacy and cost effectiveness. There are important lessons to learn about the power of professional groups to drive health policy and attain funding for rare diseases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 999-1002 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Internal Medicine Journal |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- clinical advocacy
- growth hormone
- pharmaceutical benefits scheme
- public interest submission
- rare disease