Abductive inference and delusional belief

Max Coltheart, Peter Menzies, John Sutton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Delusional beliefs have sometimes been considered as rational inferences from abnormal experiences. We explore this idea in more detail, making the following points. First, the abnormalities of cognition that initially prompt the entertaining of a delusional belief are not always conscious and since we prefer to restrict the term experience to consciousness we refer to abnormal data rather than abnormal experience. Second, we argue that in relation to many delusions (we consider seven) one can clearly identify what the abnormal cognitive data are which prompted the delusion and what the neuropsychological impairment is which is responsible for the occurrence of these data; but one can equally clearly point to cases where this impairment is present but delusion is not. So the impairment is not sufficient for delusion to occur: a second cognitive impairment, one that affects the ability to evaluate beliefs, must also be present. Third (and this is the main thrust of our paper), we consider in detail what the nature of the inference is that leads from the abnormal data to the belief. This is not deductive inference and it is not inference by enumerative induction; it is abductive inference. We offer a Bayesian account of abductive inference and apply it to the explanation of delusional belief.

LanguageEnglish
Pages261-287
Number of pages27
JournalCognitive Neuropsychiatry
Volume15
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Delusions
Aptitude
Consciousness
Cognition

Cite this

Coltheart, Max ; Menzies, Peter ; Sutton, John. / Abductive inference and delusional belief. In: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. 1-3. pp. 261-287.
@article{7a032b85928748daac44a42a6e5a2236,
title = "Abductive inference and delusional belief",
abstract = "Delusional beliefs have sometimes been considered as rational inferences from abnormal experiences. We explore this idea in more detail, making the following points. First, the abnormalities of cognition that initially prompt the entertaining of a delusional belief are not always conscious and since we prefer to restrict the term experience to consciousness we refer to abnormal data rather than abnormal experience. Second, we argue that in relation to many delusions (we consider seven) one can clearly identify what the abnormal cognitive data are which prompted the delusion and what the neuropsychological impairment is which is responsible for the occurrence of these data; but one can equally clearly point to cases where this impairment is present but delusion is not. So the impairment is not sufficient for delusion to occur: a second cognitive impairment, one that affects the ability to evaluate beliefs, must also be present. Third (and this is the main thrust of our paper), we consider in detail what the nature of the inference is that leads from the abnormal data to the belief. This is not deductive inference and it is not inference by enumerative induction; it is abductive inference. We offer a Bayesian account of abductive inference and apply it to the explanation of delusional belief.",
author = "Max Coltheart and Peter Menzies and John Sutton",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13546800903439120",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "261--287",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychiatry",
issn = "1354-6805",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "1-3",

}

Abductive inference and delusional belief. / Coltheart, Max; Menzies, Peter; Sutton, John.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 1-3, 01.2010, p. 261-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abductive inference and delusional belief

AU - Coltheart, Max

AU - Menzies, Peter

AU - Sutton, John

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Delusional beliefs have sometimes been considered as rational inferences from abnormal experiences. We explore this idea in more detail, making the following points. First, the abnormalities of cognition that initially prompt the entertaining of a delusional belief are not always conscious and since we prefer to restrict the term experience to consciousness we refer to abnormal data rather than abnormal experience. Second, we argue that in relation to many delusions (we consider seven) one can clearly identify what the abnormal cognitive data are which prompted the delusion and what the neuropsychological impairment is which is responsible for the occurrence of these data; but one can equally clearly point to cases where this impairment is present but delusion is not. So the impairment is not sufficient for delusion to occur: a second cognitive impairment, one that affects the ability to evaluate beliefs, must also be present. Third (and this is the main thrust of our paper), we consider in detail what the nature of the inference is that leads from the abnormal data to the belief. This is not deductive inference and it is not inference by enumerative induction; it is abductive inference. We offer a Bayesian account of abductive inference and apply it to the explanation of delusional belief.

AB - Delusional beliefs have sometimes been considered as rational inferences from abnormal experiences. We explore this idea in more detail, making the following points. First, the abnormalities of cognition that initially prompt the entertaining of a delusional belief are not always conscious and since we prefer to restrict the term experience to consciousness we refer to abnormal data rather than abnormal experience. Second, we argue that in relation to many delusions (we consider seven) one can clearly identify what the abnormal cognitive data are which prompted the delusion and what the neuropsychological impairment is which is responsible for the occurrence of these data; but one can equally clearly point to cases where this impairment is present but delusion is not. So the impairment is not sufficient for delusion to occur: a second cognitive impairment, one that affects the ability to evaluate beliefs, must also be present. Third (and this is the main thrust of our paper), we consider in detail what the nature of the inference is that leads from the abnormal data to the belief. This is not deductive inference and it is not inference by enumerative induction; it is abductive inference. We offer a Bayesian account of abductive inference and apply it to the explanation of delusional belief.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649310944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13546800903439120

DO - 10.1080/13546800903439120

M3 - Review article

VL - 15

SP - 261

EP - 287

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

T2 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

SN - 1354-6805

IS - 1-3

ER -