Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abjection, art and bare life

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this essay John Lechte develops the idea of the abject as beyond objectification. Grounding his argument in Immanuel Kant’s conception of the beautiful as that which has no concept, Lechte asks if there can really be an art of the abject given the concept’s elusive status. He answers this question through an analysis of the film Sombre(Dir. Philippe Grandrieux, France, 1998). For Lechte, the abject “represents” a radical immanence. Abject art is therefore art that takes the non-object as its object. Grandrieux’s films, through their chiaroscuro cinematography, comprise works in which the medium of film appears to be foregrounded. The sombre lighting makes objects difficult to discern. This has led some commentators to contend that Grandrieux brings the materiality of film to the screen. Lechte, however, argues that materiality is always already screened, barred from us, by the very process of signification that seeks to capture it. In this light, if there is an abject element to Sombre it can only ever be evoked rather than clearly represented for to represent it would be to abolish it.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAbject visions
    Subtitle of host publicationpowers of horror in art and visual culture
    EditorsRina Arya, Nicholas Chare
    Place of PublicationManchester
    PublisherManchester University Press
    Pages14-29
    Number of pages16
    ISBN (Print)9780719096280, 9780719096297
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Sombre (Dir. Philippe Grandrieux)
    • Kantian aesthetics
    • abjection
    • materiality of film
    • the non-object
    • French cinema
    • Julia Kristeva

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Abjection, art and bare life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this