Accelerometers for objective evaluation of physical activity following spine surgery

Prashanth J. Rao, Kevin Phan, Monish M. Maharaj, Matthew H. Pelletier, William R. Walsh, Ralph J. Mobbs*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the potential of bias from subjective evaluation scores in spine surgery, there is a need for practical and accurate quantitative methods of analysing patient recovery. In recent years, technologies such as accelerometers and global positioning systems have been introduced as potential objective measures for pain and symptoms following spine surgery. Overall, this perspective article aims to discuss and critique currently utilised methods of monitoring spine surgical outcomes. After analysing current modalities it will briefly analyse new potential methods before examining the place for accelerometers in the field of spine surgery. A literature review was performed on the use of accelerometers for objective evaluation of symptoms and disability after spine surgery, and perspectives are summarised in this article. Physical activity measurement with the use of accelerometers following spine surgery patients is practical and quantitative. The currently available accelerometers have the potential to transform the way functional outcomes from spine surgery are assessed. One key advantage is the collection of standardised objective measurements across studies. Future studies should aim to validate accelerometer data in relation to traditional measures of functional recovery, patient outcomes, and physical activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-18
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accelerometers
  • Disability
  • Pain
  • Physical activity
  • Spine surgery
  • Symptoms

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerometers for objective evaluation of physical activity following spine surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this