Accounting for income-contingent loans as a policy hybrid: politics of discretion and discipline in financialising welfare states

Ben Spies-Butcher, Gareth Bryant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Income-contingent loans (ICLs) are becoming widely adopted across higher education sectors internationally, and increasingly proposed for other policy domains. This article explores why this policy form has gained such wide popularity in the context of fiscal austerity and greater financialisation of social policy. It argues ICLs act as a policy hybrid, combining elements of a tax and a loan. The article traces the development of ICLs in their original and most developed context, Australia’s university sector. We connect the development of ICLs to changes in modes of state accounting associated with the application of private sector accounting techniques. These changes reflect financialisation inside the state, producing contradictory political dynamics. Drawing on Streeck’s conception of a shift from the ‘tax state’ to the ‘debt state’, we argue the hybrid construction of ICLs creates political tendencies in both directions, facilitating greater state discretion while also implementing market discipline. Alongside these contradictory state imperatives we highlight continued partisanship, pointing to new and ongoing forms of distributive politics. To the extent that accounting technologies allow the state to act as a special kind of creditor, we ask whether financialisation may also involve the emergence of an ‘asset state’.

LanguageEnglish
Pages768-785
Number of pages18
JournalNew Political Economy
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date6 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

welfare state
loan
politics
income
university sector
taxes
social policy
higher education
debt
creditor
private sector
indebtedness
popularity
policy
assets
market
university
accounting
education
tax

Cite this

@article{84422d253a9244748a3ffd050bdb690e,
title = "Accounting for income-contingent loans as a policy hybrid: politics of discretion and discipline in financialising welfare states",
abstract = "Income-contingent loans (ICLs) are becoming widely adopted across higher education sectors internationally, and increasingly proposed for other policy domains. This article explores why this policy form has gained such wide popularity in the context of fiscal austerity and greater financialisation of social policy. It argues ICLs act as a policy hybrid, combining elements of a tax and a loan. The article traces the development of ICLs in their original and most developed context, Australia’s university sector. We connect the development of ICLs to changes in modes of state accounting associated with the application of private sector accounting techniques. These changes reflect financialisation inside the state, producing contradictory political dynamics. Drawing on Streeck’s conception of a shift from the ‘tax state’ to the ‘debt state’, we argue the hybrid construction of ICLs creates political tendencies in both directions, facilitating greater state discretion while also implementing market discipline. Alongside these contradictory state imperatives we highlight continued partisanship, pointing to new and ongoing forms of distributive politics. To the extent that accounting technologies allow the state to act as a special kind of creditor, we ask whether financialisation may also involve the emergence of an ‘asset state’.",
keywords = "asset-based welfare, education, financialisation, income-contingent loans, public sector accounting, taxation, welfare state",
author = "Ben Spies-Butcher and Gareth Bryant",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13563467.2017.1393406",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "768--785",
journal = "New Political Economy",
issn = "1356-3467",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "6",

}

Accounting for income-contingent loans as a policy hybrid : politics of discretion and discipline in financialising welfare states. / Spies-Butcher, Ben; Bryant, Gareth.

In: New Political Economy, Vol. 23, No. 6, 02.11.2018, p. 768-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for income-contingent loans as a policy hybrid

T2 - New Political Economy

AU - Spies-Butcher,Ben

AU - Bryant,Gareth

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - Income-contingent loans (ICLs) are becoming widely adopted across higher education sectors internationally, and increasingly proposed for other policy domains. This article explores why this policy form has gained such wide popularity in the context of fiscal austerity and greater financialisation of social policy. It argues ICLs act as a policy hybrid, combining elements of a tax and a loan. The article traces the development of ICLs in their original and most developed context, Australia’s university sector. We connect the development of ICLs to changes in modes of state accounting associated with the application of private sector accounting techniques. These changes reflect financialisation inside the state, producing contradictory political dynamics. Drawing on Streeck’s conception of a shift from the ‘tax state’ to the ‘debt state’, we argue the hybrid construction of ICLs creates political tendencies in both directions, facilitating greater state discretion while also implementing market discipline. Alongside these contradictory state imperatives we highlight continued partisanship, pointing to new and ongoing forms of distributive politics. To the extent that accounting technologies allow the state to act as a special kind of creditor, we ask whether financialisation may also involve the emergence of an ‘asset state’.

AB - Income-contingent loans (ICLs) are becoming widely adopted across higher education sectors internationally, and increasingly proposed for other policy domains. This article explores why this policy form has gained such wide popularity in the context of fiscal austerity and greater financialisation of social policy. It argues ICLs act as a policy hybrid, combining elements of a tax and a loan. The article traces the development of ICLs in their original and most developed context, Australia’s university sector. We connect the development of ICLs to changes in modes of state accounting associated with the application of private sector accounting techniques. These changes reflect financialisation inside the state, producing contradictory political dynamics. Drawing on Streeck’s conception of a shift from the ‘tax state’ to the ‘debt state’, we argue the hybrid construction of ICLs creates political tendencies in both directions, facilitating greater state discretion while also implementing market discipline. Alongside these contradictory state imperatives we highlight continued partisanship, pointing to new and ongoing forms of distributive politics. To the extent that accounting technologies allow the state to act as a special kind of creditor, we ask whether financialisation may also involve the emergence of an ‘asset state’.

KW - asset-based welfare

KW - education

KW - financialisation

KW - income-contingent loans

KW - public sector accounting

KW - taxation

KW - welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033458570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2017.1393406

DO - 10.1080/13563467.2017.1393406

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 768

EP - 785

JO - New Political Economy

JF - New Political Economy

SN - 1356-3467

IS - 6

ER -