Accounting for within-person differences in how people respond to daily incivility at work

Larissa Beattie*, Barbara Griffin

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study investigated employees' behavioural responses to incivility, a form of interpersonal mistreatment, across time. Having established substantial within-person differences in the way individuals responded to incidents, we examined how appraisals of severity and blame, the relative status of instigator, and target personality affected how a target responded on a given day. Perceived severity of the critical incident significantly predicted whether or not a target engaged in negative behaviour towards the instigator, negative behaviour towards others, support seeking, and forgiveness. Neither the hierarchical status of the instigator relative to the target, nor the target's attributions of blame for the specific incident predicted an individual's responses to that incident. Target neuroticism predicted three response categories: ignore/avoid the instigator, respond negatively to the instigator, and seek support. Neuroticism also significantly moderated the within-person relationship between the perceived severity of an uncivil event and two daily responses: ignore/avoid the instigator and forgive the instigator. The results are discussed in terms of their practical implications for understanding how and why individuals respond to acts of incivility at work.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)625-644
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
    Volume87
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for within-person differences in how people respond to daily incivility at work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this