Acquisition of cognitive compiling

Henry Hamburger*, Stephen Crain

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Language involves both structure and process. Giving each its due, we present a cognitive process model and show how its empirical success is related to claims about syntactic structure. Innate constraints on syntax are a central issue in linguistic theory, so it is a matter of concern that a widely accepted view of phrase structure constraints (X-bar theory) appears to be violated in some recent comprehension experiments with children. However, what is directly observed in the experiments is not a syntactic structure but the execution of a plan. We present a language of process for representing such plans and thereby provide a unified explanation of several developmental phenomena, including the results of the above experiments and of new experiments suggested by our approach. The explanation is in terms of the cognitive resources required to formulate and execute a plan. Since the explanation is based on nonsyntactic processing, the children's syntax need no longer be held faulty. This conclusion invigorates the claim that the range of phrase structures available to children is biologically constrained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-136
Number of pages52
JournalCognition
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Acquisition of cognitive compiling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this