Abstract
Neil Levy argues that while addicts who believe they are not addicts are selfdeceived, addicts who believe they are addicts are just as self-deceived.Such persons accept a false belief that their addictive behaviour involves a loss of control. This paper examines two implications of Levy's discussion: that accurate self-knowledge may be particularly difficult for addicts; and that an addict's self-deceived belief that they cannot control themselves may aid their attempts at self-control. I argue that the self-deceived beliefs of addicts in denial and of self-described addicts differ in kind. Unlike the self-deception of an addict in denial, that of the self-described addict allows them to acknowledge their behaviour.As such, it may aid an addict to develop more self-control.A paradoxical implication is that this self-deception may allow an addict more self-knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 305-319 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Philosophy |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Addiction and self-deception: A method for self-control?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver