TY - JOUR
T1 - Adenosine testing after atrial fibrillation ablation
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Wang, Nelson
AU - Phan, Steven
AU - Kanagaratnam, Aran
AU - Kumar, Narendra
AU - Phan, Kevin
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Background: Adenosine can be used to reveal dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of adenosine administration in patients undergoing PVI for AF. Methods: Meta-analysis of 22 studies was performed to assess the rates of freedom from AF in 1) patients with dormant PV conduction versus patients without dormant PV conduction, and 2) patients given routine adenosine post PVI versus patients not given adenosine. Relative-risks (RR) were calculated using random effects modelling. Results: In 18 studies, 3,038 patients received adenosine and freedom from AF in those patients with dormant PV reconnection was significantly lower (62.9%) compared to patients without PV reconnection (67.2%) (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). In seven studies with 3,049 patients, the freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients who received adenosine (67%) versus those patients who did not receive adenosine (63%) (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22). Conclusions: The present study showed clear benefits of adenosine testing for freedom from AF recurrence. Adenosine-guided dormant conduction is associated with higher AF recurrence despite further ablation. Future studies should investigate the optimal methodology, including dosage and waiting time between PVI and adenosine administration.
AB - Background: Adenosine can be used to reveal dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of adenosine administration in patients undergoing PVI for AF. Methods: Meta-analysis of 22 studies was performed to assess the rates of freedom from AF in 1) patients with dormant PV conduction versus patients without dormant PV conduction, and 2) patients given routine adenosine post PVI versus patients not given adenosine. Relative-risks (RR) were calculated using random effects modelling. Results: In 18 studies, 3,038 patients received adenosine and freedom from AF in those patients with dormant PV reconnection was significantly lower (62.9%) compared to patients without PV reconnection (67.2%) (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). In seven studies with 3,049 patients, the freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients who received adenosine (67%) versus those patients who did not receive adenosine (63%) (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22). Conclusions: The present study showed clear benefits of adenosine testing for freedom from AF recurrence. Adenosine-guided dormant conduction is associated with higher AF recurrence despite further ablation. Future studies should investigate the optimal methodology, including dosage and waiting time between PVI and adenosine administration.
KW - Ablation
KW - Adenosine
KW - Atrial fibrillation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021222354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.020
DO - 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 28655535
AN - SCOPUS:85021222354
SN - 1443-9506
VL - 27
SP - 601
EP - 610
JO - Heart, Lung and Circulation
JF - Heart, Lung and Circulation
IS - 5
ER -