Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol

Zachary Munn*, Mafalda Dias, Catalin Tufanaru, Kylie Porritt, Cindy Stern, Zoe Jordan, Edoardo Aromataris, Alan Pearson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Review objective:The objective of the review is to examine Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative meta-aggregative reviews to determine:i)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the most current JBI methodological guidance and reporting standards.ii)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-450
Number of pages7
JournalJBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ENTREQ
  • meta-aggregation
  • qualitative evidence synthesis
  • qualitative research synthesis
  • systematic review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this