Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol

Zachary Munn; Mafalda Dias; Catalin Tufanaru; Kylie Porritt; Cindy Stern; Zoe Jordan; Edoardo Aromataris; Alan Pearson

doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550

Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol

Zachary Munn^*, Mafalda Dias, Catalin Tufanaru, Kylie Porritt, Cindy Stern, Zoe Jordan, Edoardo Aromataris, Alan Pearson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Review objective:The objective of the review is to examine Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative meta-aggregative reviews to determine:i)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the most current JBI methodological guidance and reporting standards.ii)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	444-450
Number of pages	7
Journal	JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Volume	17
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2019
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

ENTREQ
meta-aggregation
qualitative evidence synthesis
qualitative research synthesis
systematic review

Access to Document

10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550

Cite this

@article{76700f456ae348f9a63ffa8127ac7af5,

title = "Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol",

abstract = "Review objective:The objective of the review is to examine Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative meta-aggregative reviews to determine:i)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the most current JBI methodological guidance and reporting standards.ii)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.",

keywords = "ENTREQ, meta-aggregation, qualitative evidence synthesis, qualitative research synthesis, systematic review",

author = "Zachary Munn and Mafalda Dias and Catalin Tufanaru and Kylie Porritt and Cindy Stern and Zoe Jordan and Edoardo Aromataris and Alan Pearson",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "444--450",

journal = "JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports",

issn = "2202-4433",

publisher = "Joanna Briggs Institute",

number = "4",

}

Munn, Z, Dias, M, Tufanaru, C, Porritt, K, Stern, C, Jordan, Z, Aromataris, E & Pearson, A 2019, 'Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol', JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 444-450. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550

Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol. / Munn, Zachary; Dias, Mafalda; Tufanaru, Catalin et al.
In: JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 444-450.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance

T2 - a methodological review protocol

AU - Munn, Zachary

AU - Dias, Mafalda

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Porritt, Kylie

AU - Stern, Cindy

AU - Jordan, Zoe

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

AU - Pearson, Alan

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Review objective:The objective of the review is to examine Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative meta-aggregative reviews to determine:i)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the most current JBI methodological guidance and reporting standards.ii)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.

AB - Review objective:The objective of the review is to examine Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative meta-aggregative reviews to determine:i)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the most current JBI methodological guidance and reporting standards.ii)To what extent published meta-aggregative reviews adhere to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.

KW - ENTREQ

KW - meta-aggregation

KW - qualitative evidence synthesis

KW - qualitative research synthesis

KW - systematic review

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064722647

U2 - 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550

DO - 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30074909

AN - SCOPUS:85064722647

SN - 2202-4433

VL - 17

SP - 444

EP - 450

JO - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

JF - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

IS - 4

ER -

Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this