Aerial alarm calling by male fowl (Gallus gallus) reveals subtle new mechanisms of risk management

Artemi Kokolakis, Carolynn L. Smith, Christopher S. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Alarm calling is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. Although a signaller may increase the likelihood of survival for group members, which typically include kin and mates, there are inherent risks associated with any behaviour that increases conspicuousness to predators. Callers can increase their indirect benefits by calling only in the presence of an appropriate audience and manage concomitant costs by judicious investment. Possible tactics for controlling costs include facultative variation in call structure and timing, as well as sensitivity to the environmental and social factors that predict personal vulnerability. We examined individual variation in the alarm-calling behaviour of male fowl in naturalistic social groups. Previous studies of cost management have focused on variation at the level of alarm call rate. We took advantage of recent advances in wireless sound recording and remote video monitoring to test for more subtle variation in signal structure and timing. These were then mapped onto individual mating success and moment-to-moment changes in environmental and social context. Results replicate the previous finding that alarm calling is sensitive to both social rank and recent mating success. In addition, we detected systematic variation in call structure as a function of personal vulnerability and proximity to a rival male. The frequency bandwidth of alarms was reliably influenced by degree of vigilance prior to calling, suggesting that this acoustic dimension reflects motivational state. Taken together, these results reveal several novel tactics for risk management, complementing those previously described at the level of gross variation in alarm-calling behaviour.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1373-1380
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume79
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Gallus gallus
risk management
chickens
calling behavior
mating success
acoustics
vulnerability
cost
predators
Biological Sciences
environmental factors
vigilance
monitoring
evolutionary biology
individual variation
alarm
testing
predator

Cite this

Kokolakis, Artemi ; Smith, Carolynn L. ; Evans, Christopher S. / Aerial alarm calling by male fowl (Gallus gallus) reveals subtle new mechanisms of risk management. In: Animal Behaviour. 2010 ; Vol. 79, No. 6. pp. 1373-1380.
@article{d74da85738464534bfb3dff7a019f959,
title = "Aerial alarm calling by male fowl (Gallus gallus) reveals subtle new mechanisms of risk management",
abstract = "Alarm calling is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. Although a signaller may increase the likelihood of survival for group members, which typically include kin and mates, there are inherent risks associated with any behaviour that increases conspicuousness to predators. Callers can increase their indirect benefits by calling only in the presence of an appropriate audience and manage concomitant costs by judicious investment. Possible tactics for controlling costs include facultative variation in call structure and timing, as well as sensitivity to the environmental and social factors that predict personal vulnerability. We examined individual variation in the alarm-calling behaviour of male fowl in naturalistic social groups. Previous studies of cost management have focused on variation at the level of alarm call rate. We took advantage of recent advances in wireless sound recording and remote video monitoring to test for more subtle variation in signal structure and timing. These were then mapped onto individual mating success and moment-to-moment changes in environmental and social context. Results replicate the previous finding that alarm calling is sensitive to both social rank and recent mating success. In addition, we detected systematic variation in call structure as a function of personal vulnerability and proximity to a rival male. The frequency bandwidth of alarms was reliably influenced by degree of vigilance prior to calling, suggesting that this acoustic dimension reflects motivational state. Taken together, these results reveal several novel tactics for risk management, complementing those previously described at the level of gross variation in alarm-calling behaviour.",
author = "Artemi Kokolakis and Smith, {Carolynn L.} and Evans, {Christopher S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.013",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1373--1380",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "6",

}

Aerial alarm calling by male fowl (Gallus gallus) reveals subtle new mechanisms of risk management. / Kokolakis, Artemi; Smith, Carolynn L.; Evans, Christopher S.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 79, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 1373-1380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aerial alarm calling by male fowl (Gallus gallus) reveals subtle new mechanisms of risk management

AU - Kokolakis, Artemi

AU - Smith, Carolynn L.

AU - Evans, Christopher S.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Alarm calling is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. Although a signaller may increase the likelihood of survival for group members, which typically include kin and mates, there are inherent risks associated with any behaviour that increases conspicuousness to predators. Callers can increase their indirect benefits by calling only in the presence of an appropriate audience and manage concomitant costs by judicious investment. Possible tactics for controlling costs include facultative variation in call structure and timing, as well as sensitivity to the environmental and social factors that predict personal vulnerability. We examined individual variation in the alarm-calling behaviour of male fowl in naturalistic social groups. Previous studies of cost management have focused on variation at the level of alarm call rate. We took advantage of recent advances in wireless sound recording and remote video monitoring to test for more subtle variation in signal structure and timing. These were then mapped onto individual mating success and moment-to-moment changes in environmental and social context. Results replicate the previous finding that alarm calling is sensitive to both social rank and recent mating success. In addition, we detected systematic variation in call structure as a function of personal vulnerability and proximity to a rival male. The frequency bandwidth of alarms was reliably influenced by degree of vigilance prior to calling, suggesting that this acoustic dimension reflects motivational state. Taken together, these results reveal several novel tactics for risk management, complementing those previously described at the level of gross variation in alarm-calling behaviour.

AB - Alarm calling is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. Although a signaller may increase the likelihood of survival for group members, which typically include kin and mates, there are inherent risks associated with any behaviour that increases conspicuousness to predators. Callers can increase their indirect benefits by calling only in the presence of an appropriate audience and manage concomitant costs by judicious investment. Possible tactics for controlling costs include facultative variation in call structure and timing, as well as sensitivity to the environmental and social factors that predict personal vulnerability. We examined individual variation in the alarm-calling behaviour of male fowl in naturalistic social groups. Previous studies of cost management have focused on variation at the level of alarm call rate. We took advantage of recent advances in wireless sound recording and remote video monitoring to test for more subtle variation in signal structure and timing. These were then mapped onto individual mating success and moment-to-moment changes in environmental and social context. Results replicate the previous finding that alarm calling is sensitive to both social rank and recent mating success. In addition, we detected systematic variation in call structure as a function of personal vulnerability and proximity to a rival male. The frequency bandwidth of alarms was reliably influenced by degree of vigilance prior to calling, suggesting that this acoustic dimension reflects motivational state. Taken together, these results reveal several novel tactics for risk management, complementing those previously described at the level of gross variation in alarm-calling behaviour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952534309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1373

EP - 1380

JO - Animal Behaviour

T2 - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 6

ER -