Aerial contests, sexual selection and flight morphology in solitary pompilid wasps

Darrell J. Kemp, John Alcock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aerial contest competition has proven to be a challenging phenomenon to interpret in many territorial insects. Because the duels often consist of elaborate and/or high speed ascending maneuvers, the hypothesis that they are settled due to asymmetries in flight performance is intuitively appealing. We evaluated this hypothesis by contrasting differences in known morphological determinants of flight performance between (1) residents vs. non-residents of the territorial wasp, Hemipepsis ustulata and between (2) H. ustulata vs. a non-territorial relative, Pepsis thisbe. In the first contrast, resident male H. ustulata were seen to be larger, and had a tendency for reduced wing loading, but they did not possess greater flight musculature or wing aspect ratios (i.e., more elongated wings) than their non-resident counterparts. In the second contrast, male H. ustulata exhibited clearly greater flight musculature and greater sexual dimorphism in this parameter (males more muscular), and also exhibited a slight tendency for greater wing loading and smaller aspect ratios than males of the patrolling species P. thisbe. Interestingly, although size is linked with territorial success in H. ustulata, males of this species were not larger than male P. thisbe, nor did the former species exhibit greater sexual size dimorphism. These results do not support the hypothesis that the repeated ascending contests of H. ustulata require, and select for, a high acceleration design. However, the observed intraspecific patterns of flight musculature suggest that high acceleration is favored in males of the perching species, perhaps for the ability to intercept passing receptive females.

LanguageEnglish
Pages195-202
Number of pages8
JournalEthology
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wasps
sexual selection
wasp
flight
Sex Characteristics
contest competition
dimorphism
sexual dimorphism
Insects
asymmetry
insect
insects

Cite this

@article{8fa0a15cc42e47b494c4fb631d75167a,
title = "Aerial contests, sexual selection and flight morphology in solitary pompilid wasps",
abstract = "Aerial contest competition has proven to be a challenging phenomenon to interpret in many territorial insects. Because the duels often consist of elaborate and/or high speed ascending maneuvers, the hypothesis that they are settled due to asymmetries in flight performance is intuitively appealing. We evaluated this hypothesis by contrasting differences in known morphological determinants of flight performance between (1) residents vs. non-residents of the territorial wasp, Hemipepsis ustulata and between (2) H. ustulata vs. a non-territorial relative, Pepsis thisbe. In the first contrast, resident male H. ustulata were seen to be larger, and had a tendency for reduced wing loading, but they did not possess greater flight musculature or wing aspect ratios (i.e., more elongated wings) than their non-resident counterparts. In the second contrast, male H. ustulata exhibited clearly greater flight musculature and greater sexual dimorphism in this parameter (males more muscular), and also exhibited a slight tendency for greater wing loading and smaller aspect ratios than males of the patrolling species P. thisbe. Interestingly, although size is linked with territorial success in H. ustulata, males of this species were not larger than male P. thisbe, nor did the former species exhibit greater sexual size dimorphism. These results do not support the hypothesis that the repeated ascending contests of H. ustulata require, and select for, a high acceleration design. However, the observed intraspecific patterns of flight musculature suggest that high acceleration is favored in males of the perching species, perhaps for the ability to intercept passing receptive females.",
author = "Kemp, {Darrell J.} and John Alcock",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01452.x",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "195--202",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

Aerial contests, sexual selection and flight morphology in solitary pompilid wasps. / Kemp, Darrell J.; Alcock, John.

In: Ethology, Vol. 114, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 195-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aerial contests, sexual selection and flight morphology in solitary pompilid wasps

AU - Kemp, Darrell J.

AU - Alcock, John

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Aerial contest competition has proven to be a challenging phenomenon to interpret in many territorial insects. Because the duels often consist of elaborate and/or high speed ascending maneuvers, the hypothesis that they are settled due to asymmetries in flight performance is intuitively appealing. We evaluated this hypothesis by contrasting differences in known morphological determinants of flight performance between (1) residents vs. non-residents of the territorial wasp, Hemipepsis ustulata and between (2) H. ustulata vs. a non-territorial relative, Pepsis thisbe. In the first contrast, resident male H. ustulata were seen to be larger, and had a tendency for reduced wing loading, but they did not possess greater flight musculature or wing aspect ratios (i.e., more elongated wings) than their non-resident counterparts. In the second contrast, male H. ustulata exhibited clearly greater flight musculature and greater sexual dimorphism in this parameter (males more muscular), and also exhibited a slight tendency for greater wing loading and smaller aspect ratios than males of the patrolling species P. thisbe. Interestingly, although size is linked with territorial success in H. ustulata, males of this species were not larger than male P. thisbe, nor did the former species exhibit greater sexual size dimorphism. These results do not support the hypothesis that the repeated ascending contests of H. ustulata require, and select for, a high acceleration design. However, the observed intraspecific patterns of flight musculature suggest that high acceleration is favored in males of the perching species, perhaps for the ability to intercept passing receptive females.

AB - Aerial contest competition has proven to be a challenging phenomenon to interpret in many territorial insects. Because the duels often consist of elaborate and/or high speed ascending maneuvers, the hypothesis that they are settled due to asymmetries in flight performance is intuitively appealing. We evaluated this hypothesis by contrasting differences in known morphological determinants of flight performance between (1) residents vs. non-residents of the territorial wasp, Hemipepsis ustulata and between (2) H. ustulata vs. a non-territorial relative, Pepsis thisbe. In the first contrast, resident male H. ustulata were seen to be larger, and had a tendency for reduced wing loading, but they did not possess greater flight musculature or wing aspect ratios (i.e., more elongated wings) than their non-resident counterparts. In the second contrast, male H. ustulata exhibited clearly greater flight musculature and greater sexual dimorphism in this parameter (males more muscular), and also exhibited a slight tendency for greater wing loading and smaller aspect ratios than males of the patrolling species P. thisbe. Interestingly, although size is linked with territorial success in H. ustulata, males of this species were not larger than male P. thisbe, nor did the former species exhibit greater sexual size dimorphism. These results do not support the hypothesis that the repeated ascending contests of H. ustulata require, and select for, a high acceleration design. However, the observed intraspecific patterns of flight musculature suggest that high acceleration is favored in males of the perching species, perhaps for the ability to intercept passing receptive females.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149121376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01452.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01452.x

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 195

EP - 202

JO - Ethology

T2 - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 2

ER -