TY - JOUR
T1 - African elephants Loxodonta africana amplify browse heterogeneity in African savanna
AU - Kohi, Edward M.
AU - de Boer, Willem F.
AU - Peel, Mike J. S.
AU - Slotow, Rob
AU - van der Waal, Cornelis
AU - Heitkönig, Ignas M. A.
AU - Skidmore, Andrew
AU - Prins, Herbert H. T.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - There is a growing concern that the feeding habits of the African elephant, which include pushing over, uprooting and snapping trees, may have a negative impact on other herbivores. Browsed trees are known to respond by either increasing production (shoots and leaves) or defence (secondary compounds). It is not clear, however, what proportion of the browsed biomass can be made available at lower feeding heights after a tree is pushed over or snapped; thus, it is also unclear how the forage quality is affected. In a field survey in Kruger National Park, South Africa, 708 Mopane trees were measured over four elephant utilization categories: snapped trees, pushed-over trees, uprooted trees and control trees. The elephants' impact on the leaf biomass distribution was quantified, and the forage quality (Ca, P, K and Mg, N, digestibility and condensed tannin [CT] concentrations) were analyzed. Pushed-over and uprooted trees had the maximum leaf biomass at lower heights (<1m), snapped trees at medium heights (1-2m) and control trees at higher heights (>2m). In all three utilization categories, the minimum leaf biomass was seven times higher than it was for control trees at a height of below 1m. Leaf nitrogen content increased in all three categories and was significantly higher in snapped trees. CT concentrations increased slightly in all trees that were utilized by elephants, especially on granitic soils in the dry season. The results provide the insight that elephants facilitate the redistribution and availability of browse and improve the quality, which may positively affect small browsing herbivores.
AB - There is a growing concern that the feeding habits of the African elephant, which include pushing over, uprooting and snapping trees, may have a negative impact on other herbivores. Browsed trees are known to respond by either increasing production (shoots and leaves) or defence (secondary compounds). It is not clear, however, what proportion of the browsed biomass can be made available at lower feeding heights after a tree is pushed over or snapped; thus, it is also unclear how the forage quality is affected. In a field survey in Kruger National Park, South Africa, 708 Mopane trees were measured over four elephant utilization categories: snapped trees, pushed-over trees, uprooted trees and control trees. The elephants' impact on the leaf biomass distribution was quantified, and the forage quality (Ca, P, K and Mg, N, digestibility and condensed tannin [CT] concentrations) were analyzed. Pushed-over and uprooted trees had the maximum leaf biomass at lower heights (<1m), snapped trees at medium heights (1-2m) and control trees at higher heights (>2m). In all three utilization categories, the minimum leaf biomass was seven times higher than it was for control trees at a height of below 1m. Leaf nitrogen content increased in all three categories and was significantly higher in snapped trees. CT concentrations increased slightly in all trees that were utilized by elephants, especially on granitic soils in the dry season. The results provide the insight that elephants facilitate the redistribution and availability of browse and improve the quality, which may positively affect small browsing herbivores.
KW - browse amplification
KW - browse biomass
KW - condensed tannin
KW - elephants' impact
KW - green leaves
KW - herbivore facilitation
KW - nitrogen
KW - vertical stratification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155190103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00724.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00724.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80155190103
SN - 0006-3606
VL - 43
SP - 711
EP - 721
JO - Biotropica
JF - Biotropica
IS - 6
ER -